Hindi - Why Supreme Court Said NO to Same-Sex Marriage | Supriyo Case Judgment Explained

Imagine building a life with a partner for decades only to remain strangers in the eyes of the law. In 2023, the Supreme Court of India delivered one of its most anticipated and complex verdicts in history, addressing whether LGBTQIA+ couples have the right to marry.
This video provides a detailed legal breakdown of the Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty v. Union of India judgment. We analyze why the 5-judge Constitution Bench delivered a 3:2 split verdict, ultimately refusing to legalize same-sex marriage or civil unions. We explore the legal reasoning behind why the Court deferred to Parliament, the debate over "reading down" the Special Marriage Act, and the heartbreaking ruling on adoption rights.
Whether you are a law student, a competitive exam aspirant, or a citizen concerned with civil liberties, this video explains the fine line between judicial activism and judicial restraint.
Topics Covered in This Video:
The conflict: Fundamental Rights vs. Legislative Power
Analysis of the 3:2 Split Verdict (Majority vs. Minority opinions)
Why the Court ruled there is no "Fundamental Right to Marry"
The debate on interpreting the Special Marriage Act, 1954
The ruling on Adoption Rights under the Juvenile Justice Act
The future of LGBTQIA+ rights and the High-Powered Committee
Key Statutes and Provisions:
Special Marriage Act, 1954 (Section 4)
Constitution of India: Articles 14 (Equality), 15 (Non-discrimination), 19 (Freedom of Speech), 21 (Life & Liberty), and 25 (Conscience)
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
Case Citation:
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India (2023 INSC 920)
Who This Video Is For:
Law students and legal professionals
Aspirants of UPSC, CLAT, and Judiciary exams
LGBTQIA+ rights advocates and allies
General public interested in Constitutional Law
Disclaimer:
This video is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is based on the court's judgment and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with a qualified legal professional. Case facts and legal interpretations can be complex and specific to individual circumstances.

#SameSexMarriageIndia, #SupremeCourtOfIndia, #SupriyoCase, #LGBTQRights, #ConstitutionOfIndia, #LegalExplainer, #CJIChandrachud, #SpecialMarriageAct, #CivilUnions, #AdoptionRights, #LawStudent, #UPSC, #CLAT, #JurisOptima