Stunt Driving Radar Evidence: I Wasn't Going That Fast
Автор: NextLaw
Загружено: 2025-09-11
Просмотров: 42
Hi, I'm Jonathan Cohen from Nextlaw. One of the most common things I hear from stunt driving clients is "There's no way I was going that fast" or "The speed limit was different where the officer was hiding." I understand why you feel this way, but here's the hard truth: your feelings about the speed don't matter in court. Let me explain what actually does matter in your stunt driving case.
Why Your Opinion Doesn't Matter in Court
When you're pulled over for stunt driving, it's natural to question the officer's speed reading. Maybe you think the speed limit was higher where you were caught, or lower where the officer was positioned. Maybe you're certain you weren't going as fast as they claim. But here's what you need to understand: stunt driving cases are not based on how you feel or what you believe happened. They're based on cold, hard evidence that will be presented to the court.
What Actually Determines Your Case?
Your stunt driving case will be decided by something called "disclosure" - a detailed evidence package that the officer submits to the court within 4 to 12 weeks, sometimes longer. This isn't a simple one-page report. We're talking about 20 to 40 pages of comprehensive documentation that includes everything: exactly where you were caught, your alleged speed, the posted speed limit at that specific location, the type of radar or laser device used, when it was last calibrated, and detailed test results from before and after your stop.
What's Actually in the Police Evidence?
The disclosure package contains technical details that most people never think about. It shows the officer's training records, the radar calibration certificates, the specific location coordinates, weather conditions, traffic patterns, and step-by-step procedures the officer followed. It includes photos of the radar display, notes about sight lines, and documentation of any obstacles that might affect the reading. This evidence package is what the court will use to determine if you're guilty - not your memory of events or your interpretation of what happened.
Why Emotions Don't Win Cases
I get it - you're frustrated because you don't believe the officer's version of events. But stunt driving defence isn't about believing or disbelieving anyone. It's about systematically analyzing the officer's evidence and finding weaknesses, inconsistencies, or procedural errors. Did the radar get calibrated properly? Was the officer positioned correctly? Were there any environmental factors that could affect the reading? Were proper procedures followed? These are the questions that matter in court.
How We Actually Defend These Cases
At Nextlaw, we don't argue about whether you "feel" you were going that fast. Instead, we meticulously review every page of the disclosure looking for technical defences. We examine radar calibration records, officer training certificates, environmental conditions, and procedural compliance. We look for gaps in the evidence, inconsistencies in the documentation, or violations of your Charter rights. This systematic approach is what gets charges reduced or withdrawn - not emotional arguments about fairness.
Stop worrying about whether you agree with the officer's speed reading. That's not how stunt driving cases are won or lost. What matters is the technical evidence, and whether we can find weaknesses in the Crown's case. With penalties including up to $10,000 in fines, a one-year license suspension, and potential jail time, you need a legal representative who understands how to attack the evidence systematically. Contact Nextlaw immediately - because your future depends on proper analysis of the disclosure, not on how fast you think you were going.
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке:
