Jay Patel: Can 11% a year fund your retirement?

Jay Patel is a real estate fund manager and we spoke about why he pushes people to rethink defaulting to the stock market when planning retirement. He argues many investors want a better return with less risk, yet find real estate “too intimidating” and don’t want the “headaches of managing real estate,” especially dealing with tenants—so the real question becomes whether you can access real estate returns without becoming a full-time landlord.


We also talked about what drives his approach: capital preservation first, then dependable income, then legacy. Jay framed the planning problem bluntly—“do you have enough saved and do you have a plan?”—and pointed to the risk of retirees depleting savings as living costs rise. He shared his own hard lessons from big losses (“I was 23, 24, thought I knew everything, and I lost a million bucks again…”) and the rule he now lives by: “it’s not the product, it’s the person,” meaning you should scrutinize the operators behind any investment before you commit.


From there, Jay walked through a concrete retirement math example: if someone had $500,000 and could compound at 11% for a decade, it could grow to “almost 1.5 million,” creating roughly “$12 and a half, $13,000 a month consistently” in income without drawing down principal—leaving more to pass on to family. The practical value for listeners is a simple decision framework: prioritize preservation, understand where returns actually come from, and don’t “try to fake it”—either learn the game or find the right experts before you move.


Key takeaways

• Don’t default to stocks; evaluate alternatives with lower risk.
• Aim for retirement plans that preserve capital and generate steady income.
• If real estate intimidates you, avoid tenant headaches via managed structures.
• Vet operators closely: “it’s not the product, it’s the person.”
• Use compounding math: $500k at 11% can approach $1.5M in 10 years.
• Don’t fake expertise—educate yourself or find an expert before investing.