SOMETHING STRANGE IS GOING ON WITH THIS YOUTUBE FAMILY 😳🫣 SCHOELLER FAMILY....

#viralvideo #podcast #cjsocool #youtube #youtubepersonality #crime #narcissisticabuse #relationship #viral#shorts#shoellerfamily. The Strange Life Of This YouTube Family Schoeller Family😳😧🫣‪@TheSchoellerFamily‬
The speaker expresses concerns about the Schoeller family, Emily and John Schoeller, who are YouTube family vloggers. The speaker believes that family vlogging should be banned due to potential exploitation and harm to children, citing the "CJ situation" and what they've observed with the Schoeller family (0:40-1:05).

The speaker highlights several "red flags" regarding the Schoeller family's treatment of their adopted daughter:
Financial Instability: The speaker asserts that the family appears too poor to have adopted a child and struggles financially (1:18-1:22, 7:52-8:05, 12:19-12:23). They point out inconsistencies, such as the family seemingly not being able to afford basic items like a doll for the child (4:45-5:04) or proper ice skating attire (5:47-5:57), yet they travel extensively (3:30-3:32, 9:21-9:23).
Performative Affection: The speaker claims the parents' affection towards the adopted daughter is "performative" and excessive, unlike their interactions with their biological children (1:54-2:06, 2:20-2:28, 6:39-6:46, 13:08-13:21).
Lack of Stability and Frequent Travel: The speaker criticizes the family for constantly traveling abroad with the child, arguing it lacks structure and stability, which is detrimental to a child's development (2:52-3:36, 8:45-8:52, 9:16-9:20). They suggest the extensive travel, despite financial struggles, is suspicious and could indicate a plan to traffic or harm the child for money, drawing parallels to the "CJ So Cool" situation (3:54-4:10, 11:01-11:04, 14:11-14:26).
Child's Appearance and Behavior: The speaker mentions the child is often dressed in "poor" or "special needs-ish" outfits (5:07-5:21, 5:37-5:45, 8:15-8:18, 12:09-12:11) and notes the child's discomfort getting dressed around the parents as "odd behavior" (6:52-7:18, 7:21-7:37).
Lack of Investment: The speaker concludes that the parents show no long-term investment in the child, evidenced by her lack of toys and basic necessities (12:02-12:17).

The speaker urges the child's biological mother, Chartisa, to intervene, believing the child is in danger and is being used for financial gain (10:10-10:13, 10:40-10:48, 11:08-11:12). They also suggest the biological mother can challenge the adoption (11:18-11:21). The speaker emphasizes that these observations are based on visual evidence and personal belief, while stating that the information is alleged and for entertainment purposes only (0:08-0:14, 1:08-1:10, 7:45-7:49, 16:15-16:17).