Criminal Defense Lawyer Audits The TV Show "COPS"-Episode 1

To Support the SDL channel:

Paypal:
https://paypal.me/southerndrawllaw?co...

Venmo:
https://venmo.com/u/James-White-1761

Thanks for all you do!

In this video, Criminal Defense Attorney James White, takes you back in time to conduct a retrospective audit on the popular TV Show Cops, giving you a glimpse of what policing looked like before body cameras and cell phone videos uploaded to youtube changed everything.

He discusses the implications of Miranda rights, the concept of excited utterances, and the definition of hearsay in legal contexts. The conversation highlights the dangers of police encounters and the lack of accountability in law enforcement as portrayed in media.

Takeaways

The Cops TV show provides insight into police conduct before body cameras.
Police encounters can be dangerous and confusing for civilians.
Miranda rights must be given when a person is in custody.
Excited utterances can be used as evidence in court.
Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove truth.
The production of Cops TV show often misrepresents police interactions.
Public support for police can stem from media portrayals.
Understanding legal terms is crucial for defendants.
The lack of accountability in police work is a significant issue.
Always document interactions with law enforcement for protection.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to Lawyer Audits the Cops
04:47 Understanding Miranda Rights and Custody
09:32 Excited Utterances and Hearsay Explained


COPSTV:
   • Las Vegas Night Patrol  -  Crime Patrol | ...  

*Linking original content from other creators for the purposes of giving them credit, as well as providing context for the critical analysis under fair use.***** FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.