Python Parameter Naming: Best Practices for format and type Parameters
Автор: vlogommentary
Загружено: 2025-12-18
Просмотров: 0
Learn Python conventions for naming parameters that specify return format or type, avoid built-in name shadowing, and improve code clarity.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/79460092/ asked by the user 'Paidon' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2227024/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/79460282/ provided by the user 'Adam' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/170614/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Are there conventions as to what to name parameters in Python that could be "format" or "type"?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to drop me a comment under this video.
---
Introduction
When designing Python functions that return values in different formats or types, developers often include parameters like format or type to control the output. However, such parameter names shadow Python built-in functions (format() and type()), leading to warnings in IDEs like PyCharm and potentially causing confusion.
This guide explores best practices for naming these parameters clearly and safely.
The Problem with format and type
Both are Python built-in names.
Using them as parameter names shadows the built-ins, possibly producing IDE warnings.
Shadowing can make code harder to read or maintain, especially for others.
Naming Conventions: What Does the Standard Library Do?
Python’s standard library does not enforce a single convention:
typing.cast uses typ
typing.is_protocol uses tp
super uses type
This illustrates some flexibility but also inconsistency.
Recommended Naming Alternatives
Be descriptive and explicit. For example, use return_type or output_type instead of just type.
Avoid overly short forms like tp or typ unless it's clear in context.
Example:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This approach has advantages:
No shadowing of built-in names.
Cleaner, more readable code.
Compatible with type annotations and type checkers like mypy.
Avoiding String-Based Format Selection
Passing a string to indicate output format (e.g., format="str") can lead to unnecessary complexity, such as:
Manual string comparisons.
Increased chance of typos and runtime errors.
Instead, accept a callable or a type, allowing Python's built-in conversion functions to handle the transformation gracefully.
Summary
Avoid format and type as parameter names to prevent shadowing.
Use clear names like return_type or output_type.
Prefer passing types or callables directly instead of string flags.
Leverage Python’s type system and annotations for cleaner, safer code.
By adopting these simple conventions, you’ll write clearer, more maintainable Python functions for flexible return types or formats.
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке: