Ray's Astrophotography Proved It: NASA's 3I/ATLAS Images Don't Match Raw Data

Ray's Astrophotography, an independent researcher, downloaded raw Hubble Space Telescope data of comet 3I/ATLAS (C/2024 S1) and discovered significant discrepancies between NASA's published images and the actual observation files. This educational deep-dive serves as your interactive warm-up to understanding how image processing can dramatically alter our perception of celestial objects.


📚 SOURCES & REFERENCES & CREDITS

🔔SUBSCRIBE TO - ‪@RaysAstrophotography‬

Ray's Astrophotography Full Video Link:    • Comet 3i Atlas - What Hubble REALLY SAW - ...  

In this immersive warm-up analysis, we examine the December 4th, 2024 Hubble observations of 3I/ATLAS. Ray processed the same raw data NASA used, applying standard astronomical techniques, yet arrived at fundamentally different results. While NASA's release shows a compressed point source with minimal structure, Ray's independent processing reveals a large cone-shaped object with visible jets and complex tail features. This immersive interactive comparison demonstrates the importance of independent verification in modern astronomy.
The interactive warm-up exercises presented here include: Side-by-side comparison of NASA's processed image vs raw data analysis Detailed examination of Point Spread Function (PSF) modeling techniques Ground-based observations showing structures absent from official releases Time-lapse analysis revealing dynamic jet activity in 3I/ATLAS.

This immersive interactive investigation isn't about conspiracy—it's about scientific methodology. Ray's Astrophotography demonstrates that the 270-second Hubble exposures were likely too long for an object as bright as 3I/ATLAS, causing oversaturation. Previous Hubble observations used 40-second exposures that successfully captured rotational dynamics. The immersive warm-up to understanding this discrepancy helps viewers appreciate how processing choices impact final results.

Through these interactive warm-up exercises, we explore:

How PSF (Point Spread Function) modeling works in astronomical imaging.
Why exposure time selection matters for bright, active comets like 3I/ATLAS.
The difference between raw sensor data and algorithmically processed releases.
How amateur ground-based equipment can sometimes reveal more structural detail than space telescopes.


Ray's immersive interactive analysis of 3I/ATLAS reveals:
✅ Raw Hubble files show large, structured central region—not a point source
✅ NASA's processing removed visible jet structures and tail extensions
✅ Ground-based 40-60 second exposures preserve more detail than 270-second space observations
✅ Time-lapse observations show spiral jets rotating backward into solar wind
✅ Multiple independent observers confirm similar structural features.

This immersive warm-up to raw astronomical data analysis teaches critical thinking about published scientific images. When institutions apply standardized processing to non-standard objects, important features can be lost. The interactive warm-up exercises demonstrated here encourage viewers to question, verify, and compare multiple data sources—fundamental principles of the scientific method.

About Ray's Astrophotography: Ray is an independent astrophotographer who conducts his own research on comets, asteroids, and celestial phenomena. His immersive interactive approach to astronomy combines backyard observations with professional-level data analysis. By downloading and processing NASA's raw files, Ray provides crucial independent verification of official releases.

This immersive interactive warm-up to understanding astronomical image processing serves as an educational resource for anyone interested in how scientific images are created, interpreted, and published. The interactive warm-up exercises presented encourage critical thinking and independent verification—essential skills in modern science education.
Subscribe to Ray's Astrophotography for unfiltered astronomical observations and analysis. His immersive interactive approach to celestial imaging provides unique perspectives often missing from institutional releases.


Disclaimer: This video presents educational analysis and comparison of publicly available astronomical data. All Hubble raw files used are publicly accessible through NASA's archive. This immersive warm-up to data interpretation encourages scientific discourse and independent verification.