Fractal FM3 vs Quad Cortex: Which will I sell?

[Reupload in 1080 (export settings got messed up the first time ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)]

Today we'll do a blind A/B comparison between the Fractal FM3 and the Neural DSP Quad Cortex, modelling heavy tones on some Bogner amps and clean tones on the Fender Twin Reverb.

This video is not sponsored in any way. I'll be rating both modellers subjectively based on: Sound Quality, Ease of Use, and Performance Ruggedness, and will ultimately choose one to keep and one to sell based on these categories.

Note: I honestly believe that these are both amazing modellers and think any guitarist would be happy with either. This could have been a very long video if I touched on every aspect to consider for both, but I tried to keep it more focused on what I considered to be the key points to compare.

For more in depth reviews of both modellers individually, I recommend the videos by Ola Englund:
FM3 -    • Fractal Audio FM3 - Using it Live - METAL  
Quad Cortex.-    • QUAD CORTEX FOR METAL  

------

Track was recorded DI and re-amped through both modellers with all compression, overdrive, delays and reverbs processed inside each of the respective units (with the exception of some master bus compression and a bit of GW MixCentric for that extra sparkle on the whole track). You can listen to the track re-amped just for each unit on my SoundCloud   / modeller-shootout-fractal-fm3-vs-neural-ds...  .

Gear:
Logic Pro X
Aristides 070
Fishman Fluence Modern Pickups
Superior Drummer 3 (Drums)
Roli Equator (Bass)
EastWest (Strings, Bells)
Alchemy (other synth sounds)