Roblox's WORST RESPONSE.. (Roblox Vs. Schlep)

roblox is DISGUSTING... (Schlep Roblox Lawsuit Drama EXPLAINED)

So recently Roblox Drama YouTuber Schlep known for his Pred Catching series on Roblox 'To Catch a Robloxian', where he collaborates with Ruben Sim, Jidion and more, was BANNED off of Roblox and THREATENED with a Lawsuit after Schlep received a CEASE AND DESIST from the Roblox Corporation. The Roblox Schlep Lawsuit / Ban Drama has gone VIRAL with many Large YouTuber's covering the Schlep Roblox Moderation Situation such as Charlie / MoistCritical, KreekCraft, Ruben Sim, Jidion and others. Roblox is now THREATENING to BAN other Roblox YouTubers including myself with their new HORRIBLE roblox moderation policies which Schlep had called them out for before. Roblox RESPONDED by doubling down on their original claims and still refuse to UNBAN SCHLEP or FREE SCHLEP. Since my last video there have been a lot of updates with Roblox NEW RESPONSE where they basically said Schlep Is a creep which is untrue which means Roblox LIED..

Make sure to Leave a LIKE and SUBSCRIBE to help as many people as possible be made aware and informed/educated on this situation! Please watch this video to the end to be informed on the entire drama/situation!

🌟 For more Information about topics in this video consider:
Join My Discord Server:   / discord  
Follow My Twitter:   / gwamgoxd  

This video is created for informational, educational, and commentary purposes only. The content in this video is not intended to target, harass or bully any individual mentioned. All opinions expressed are based on publicly available information and are solely for discussion and analysis. We strongly condemn harassment, bullying, raiding and any form of online misconduct. Viewers are reminded to engage respectfully and responsibly, both in the comments and outside this platform. Disclaimer: The content presented in this video contains opinions, speculations, and allegations regarding anyone. Please note that these statements are not presented as factual or proven, but as individual claims and assertions that may not reflect the truth. Any statements made are for commentary, discussion, or speculative purposes only. No malice or ill intent is directed at anyone. The purpose is purely to engage in a critical dialogue on the topic, not to attack any individual or entity.