Predicting Out of Sample with a Fixed Effects Model in R

Learn how to effectively predict out of sample values using a `fixed effects model` in R. This guide explores common errors and provides a straightforward solution.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65702581/ asked by the user 'John' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11178936/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65717158/ provided by the user 'John' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11178936/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Predict out of sample on fixed effects model

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Predicting Out of Sample with a Fixed Effects Model in R

When working with fixed effects models in R, you may encounter certain challenges, especially when attempting to make predictions out of sample. This guide addresses a commonly faced problem when using the plm package for panel data analysis and offers a clear solution to enable out-of-sample prediction.

The Problem

You might have set up a fixed effects model using the plm package to analyze your dataset. For example, let's consider the following model created using the Produc dataset:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This model fits well within the training dataset, but the real challenge arises when you try to predict out of sample using the predict function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You encounter the following error message:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error appears due to the nature of fixed effects models, where traditional prediction approaches do not apply directly, leading to frustration.

Understanding Fixed Effects Models

Fixed effects models are particularly useful when dealing with panel data, allowing you to account for individual variability by focusing on changes within an entity over time. However, due to the way these models handle intercepts, predicting out of sample can lead to errors that are not apparent in other model types.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, instead of following the standard modeling approach, you need to modify your model slightly by deleting the intercept. This can be done by setting the model formula as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By incorporating 0 + , you're effectively removing the intercept from the model, which is crucial for out-of-sample predictions.

Making Predictions

With the adjusted model, you can confidently make predictions for new data. Here’s the complete code for predicting out-of-sample values:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This will yield the fitted value without throwing any errors:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In summary, predicting out of sample using a fixed effects model in R can pose challenges due to how the model treats intercepts. By removing the intercept when defining your model, you can successfully make out-of-sample predictions. This adjustment allows you to leverage the power of fixed effects while ensuring your predictions accurately reflect new scenarios.

With this understanding, you can further explore panel data analysis and enhance your predictive modeling efforts without the hassle of encountering persistent errors.