Detecting Continuous Increase in Numbers: A Guide to PostgreSQL Queries

Learn how to detect non-increasing numbers in PostgreSQL with a step-by-step query approach. Enhance your SQL skills and optimize your data integrity checks!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67418268/ asked by the user 'nachocab' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/355567/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67420404/ provided by the user 'MtwStark' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4523896/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to detect if a column is increasing continuously in postgres?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Detecting Non-Increasing Numbers in PostgreSQL

When working with databases, particularly with numeric data, it's essential to ensure that your values follow a specific order. In this post, we will address a common problem faced by many developers: detecting if the numbers in a column are continuously increasing within a specified category. This task is crucial for data integrity and preventing logical errors in your applications.

The Problem

Imagine you have a table data organized by categories and numbers. However, once in a while, the numbers can become disordered, breaking the expected sequence. For example, consider the following dataset:

categorynumberA1B2C4D3F5F6G7H9H8In the example above, you can see that the number associated with 'D' is 3, which is less than the previous number for 'C' (which is 4), indicating a break in the increasing order. Similarly, 'H' has an out-of-order number.

The challenge is to write a PostgreSQL query that highlights these discrepancies effectively.

The Proposed Solution

To effectively identify the rows that do not maintain an increasing number, you can utilize a combination of the ROW_NUMBER() function along with a self-join operation. The following SQL query outlines this approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Query

CTE Declaration: The query begins with a Common Table Expression (CTE) named test that initializes a dataset using the VALUES clause.

Row Number Assignment: A second CTE, test_idx, is used to assign a unique sequential number (ID) to each row in the dataset based on the ordered fields.

Self-Join: The main selection involves a self-join between the test_idx CTE. Each row t1 is joined to its immediate successor t2, allowing us to directly compare the numbers.

Filter for Non-Consecutive Numbers: Finally, a WHERE clause filters out all rows where the number does not increase by exactly 1 compared to the previous row.

Sample Output

When you run the provided query against the sample dataset, you will get the following output, indicating rows where the sequence is not increasing:

ididc1c2n1n2diff23BC24234CD43-145DF352This output clearly indicates where the breaks in the increasing order occur.

Conclusion

By using the above query structure, you can efficiently detect any breaks in the increasing number sequence within your PostgreSQL databases. This technique not only improves data integrity but also enhances your SQL skills by utilizing advanced functions and join operations. Feel free to tweak the query based on your data requirements to ensure a seamless experience in managing your datasets!