Finding a sufficient assumption - Real LSAT Question & Explanation - Test 73 - Difficulty 5/5

Watch Nathan attack a Sufficient Assumption question from Test 73 in this comprehensive explanation.

The argument’s conclusion is, “The chair should not have released the report.” But it’s supported by only one premise: The chair didn’t consult anyone before releasing the report.

That’s a bad argument—not consulting anyone doesn’t necessarily mean you shouldn’t release a report. So how do we make it work? We find a sufficient assumption.

Sufficient Assumption questions are predictable. The correct answer will simply connect the evidence to the conclusion. Here’s our prediction: “The chair should release the report only if she consults at least one other member of the commission.”

🔍 Key Topics Covered:
How to approach Sufficient Assumption questions.
Learn more about making predictions and solving Sufficient Assumption questions ➔    • Logical Reasoning: Sufficient Assumption  

🔗 Explore:
Create a free Demon account and use our Scholarship Estimator tool to see what LSAT score you might need to earn a full-tuition scholarship and go to law school for free: https://www.lsatdemon.com/scholarships

📚 Subscribe and Stay Updated:
Subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications for more in-depth explanations of LSAT questions, law school admissions, and test prep strategies.

Stay ahead in your LSAT prep with our expert guidance and resources.

Don’t pay for law school!

Create your free LSAT Demon account today and start drilling real LSAT questions: https://www.lsatdemon.com/

#LSATDemon #lsatpreparation #lawschool #lawstudent #futurelawyers #lsatquestions #lsatstudying #lsatprep #logicalreasoning #lsattips #LSAT