California’s Ammo Law Deemed Unconstitutional—So What's Next?

CRPA President Chuck Michel returns to break down the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Rhode v. Bonta, where California’s convoluted ammunition background check system was declared unconstitutional.

This in-depth conversation explores how Prop 63 evolved into a rights-restricting nightmare, why the court called it a “background check scheme,” and what happens next—including the likelihood of an en banc review or a trip to the Supreme Court.

The ruling is a major win, but the law still stands—for now. Find out why this opinion matters, how Bruen continues to reshape the Second Amendment legal landscape, and what Californians can expect in the fight for freedom.

👉 Want to support victories like this? Become a CRPA member today:
👉 californiariflepistol.app.neoncrm.com/forms/crpatv

🛡️ Sponsors
Join CCW Safe Today → https://ccwsafe.com/?utm_source=CRPA%...
The Police Credit Union → https://www.thepolicecu.org | 800.222.1391

🔔 Like | Share | Subscribe to directly support our advocacy and legal efforts.
📰 Stay informed on Rhode v. Bonta and other 2A lawsuits: crpa.org

🔔 Like, share, and subscribe to help spread the word!

#2AVictory #RhodevBonta #CRPA

00:00 – Ninth Circuit Declares Ammo Law Unconstitutional
01:00 – What Prop 63 Did and Why It Got Worse
03:00 – The Broken Background Check System
05:00 – Bruen Standard and the Scheme’s Collapse
07:00 – Why the Law Still Stands Despite the Ruling
09:00 – What Happens Next: En Banc and Supreme Court?
11:00 – Courts Are Finally Getting It Right
13:00 – The Broader Pattern in Second Amendment Wins
15:00 – Chuck’s Final Thoughts: Hold the Line

#RhodeVBonta #Prop63 #AmmoBackgroundChecks #SecondAmendment #GunRights #BruenStandard #NinthCircuit #CRPA #ChuckMichel #CaliforniaGunLaws #2AWin #EnBanc #SCOTUS #2ALitigation #GunControlPushback