Judge Simpson's DEMANDS Answers as Defense Pushes 404(A)(2)(C) to Break Rape-Shield Protections!
Автор: Judge zone
Загружено: 2025-12-07
Просмотров: 3
Today’s hearing erupts before evidence even begins. In People v. Cyrus Abati, a routine preliminary exam transforms into a volatile showdown over professional conduct, gendered disrespect, and the limits of what the defense can ask in a CSC case.
The prosecutor accuses defense of crossing ethical lines in filings and emails. The defense fires back with legal arguments under MRE 404(A)(2)(C). And Judge Boyd?
He’s done with the tone—demanding accuracy, professionalism, and proof for every accusation made in his courtroom.
🔥 Key flashpoints you’ll see unfold:
• A dispute over whether rape-shield protections apply at prelim
• Prosecutor claims gender-based treatment after a hostile email surfaces
• Judge Boyd warns: “If you allege misconduct, you bring receipts.”
• Defense pushes a bold reading of MRE 404(A)(2)(C) to bypass pre-motion requirements
• A request to strike a paragraph from the public record
• Judicial disappointment that hits like a hammer: “I expected better from you.”
This isn’t just a hearing—it’s a masterclass in how tone, procedure, and professionalism shape justice long before a jury ever hears a word.
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке:
