Solving HAProxy Redirect Challenges for Multiple Servers: A Shift to NGINX Solution

Discover how to effectively redirect requests in HAProxy, explore its limitations, and find an NGINX-based solution to manage multiple backends seamlessly.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66777960/ asked by the user 'João Gonçalves' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9343066/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66866771/ provided by the user 'João Gonçalves' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9343066/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: HAProxy redirect based on the selected server

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving HAProxy Redirect Challenges for Multiple Servers: A Shift to NGINX Solution

When managing web services deployed across different cloud platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Azure, you may encounter challenges with setting up a load balancer like HAProxy to redirect requests based on the selected backend server. This issue becomes particularly relevant when you need to route requests to specific endpoints depending on which server was chosen by your load balancing strategy.

The Problem

A user recently asked for assistance with configuring HAProxy to direct traffic to one of three backend services located on different servers:

AWS Service: address1.com/service

Azure Service: address2.com/bucketName/service

GCP Service: address3.com/api/service

The core challenge lies in HAProxy's inability to modify the request path based on the server chosen; thus, requests like example.com/helloWorld could not be redirected properly to address3.com/api/helloWorld depending on the selected server.

Attempted Solution

The initial HAProxy configuration attempted by the user looked something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Despite trying ACLs (Access Control Lists) to manage the redirection, it became clear that HAProxy's limit in this context required re-evaluation.

The Solution: Switching to NGINX

After encountering numerous challenges with HAProxy, the user opted to switch to NGINX to facilitate this redirection based on server selection. The resulting NGINX configuration was as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Configuration

Defining Upstream Servers:

The upstream directive defines multiple backend servers, allowing NGINX to load balance the incoming requests to different backend services based on the defined rules.

Server Blocks:

Each server block corresponds to a specific backend service (AWS, Azure, GCP).

Requests to each service are proxied to their respective URLs, keeping the path intact.

Listening on Different Ports:

Each service is assigned its own port (8091 for AWS, 8092 for Azure, and 8093 for GCP). This aspect allows NGINX to segregate traffic effectively.

Proxy Pass:

The proxy_pass directive is pivotal as it forwards requests to the backend servers while preserving the structure of the original request.

Conclusion

Switching from HAProxy to NGINX allowed for a more flexible solution to the routing problem the user faced. While HAProxy is an excellent load balancer, it may not always provide the necessary features for more complex routing logic. NGINX comes with a powerful, user-friendly configuration structure that can cater to varied requirements, particularly for cloud-based applications.

If you find yourself facing similar challenges, it may be worth exploring NGINX as a viable alternative to tackle routing complexities efficiently.