Gemini AI is SO MUCH WORSE Than You Think - Metatron VS Gemini AI

On this video we take on Gemini Ai though a test I've prepared to specifically find out if the AI has a political bias injected into its instructions and code. Get ready, this is going to be a full on mask off.

link to my Patreon! Please support us and help us defend the truth!
  / themetatron  

Link to my video about Jada Smith
   • Jada Pinkett Smith and Director of Cleopat...  

The controversy also raises deeper questions about the role and responsibilities of AI systems in shaping public perception and knowledge. As AI-generated content becomes increasingly prevalent, there are concerns about the potential for these systems to spread misinformation or manipulate the public.

Ultimately, the debate surrounding Gemini AI and historically inaccurate images highlights the complex ethical considerations that arise at the intersection of AI, art, and the spread of information. It underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and critical examination of the societal implications of AI-generated content and the importance of striking a balance between the pursuit of real representation of minorities however not at the expenses of historical accuracy, and the preservation of documented historical authenticity.

Developers response and current state
After massive backlash the programmers have approached the issue by momentarily removing the ability of the ai to generate images of people, with a promise that a "fix" will soon be released.
When controversies like this arise, AI developers should respond by reviewing their systems, engaging in public dialogue, and making adjustments as necessary to address ethical concerns and maintain public trust. Of course the specific actions taken can vary depending on the organization, the nature of the issue, and the feedback received not only from the public but let's not forget, from stake and shareholders.

Whatever the case, the primary emphasis should be on the pursuit of AI systems that exemplify maximal objectivity, truthfulness, and societal benefit, irrespective of political considerations.

The Test

One thing we can do as the public is to put Gemini Ai under user scrutiny.

For this reason I've put together a "test" to see if indeed simply removing the ai ability to generate images of people was enough to solve the algorithmic problem.

We will be investigating to see if the ai has any political bias, the current accusatino being that Gemini ai has been programmed to push very specific political agendas onto the public.
Is this true? Or are people over reacting?

Methodology

Our methodology today must be grounded in a nuanced understanding of the political landscape and a commitment to impartiality. The analytical framework for undertaking such an investigation is based on objectivity and intellectual rigor.
Thus I won't be sharing my opinions or positions about the issues presented to the ai, hence only assessing whether IT seems to have any inherent bias by design.

The foundation of our investigation lies in the formulation of carefully constructed, open-ended questions designed to elicit revealing responses. These questions should span a wide range of topics, from specific socio political items, policy issues to broader philosophical principles and historical matters in order to gather valuable insights into the machine's thought and logical processes and the underlying assumptions of its code.

We must also critically examine the language employed, paying close attention to the framing of arguments, the selective emphasis on certain facts, and the presence of emotionally charged rhetoric which, since the ai has no emotions whatsoever, would be an indicator of human bias scripted into the code.

Sources of information shape an individual's political worldview. Inquiring about their preferred news outlets, influential thinkers, and trusted authorities can shed light on the intellectual ecosystems they inhabit and presence of possible echo chambers.

#geminiai #politicalpropaganda #debunking