Projectile assault on already injured cat and hacker activities

Initial moment of me declaring of hackers is moving my camera has been somehow cut off. The dog bark broadcasted through voice intercom came from my East neighbors backyard from their device connected to my surveillance camera they hacked. In the video you can see and hear projectiles coming at my property and hitting my home. The abusive assaults via hacked camera, battery of projectile shootings intensify the moment community cat arrives at the feeding station. When cat is scared by these assaults and tries to leave the area , cat is ducking to avoid projectile but also might have been hit with another projectile. Also in video recording you can hear one of the hacker’s team members. Intentionally excessive loud car driving is also big part of community harassment. This is organized crime breaking multiple federal and state laws.

Jimenez and Cornelius/Spitali households have been caught on video shooting at my home, so are some other participants using cars and motorbikes

Unfortunately police have been dismissive of my complaints and have made attempts to paint me as mentally ill. If I would be mentally ill: these crimes would be considered even more aggravating.

I am adding Grok AI analyses pertaining not only to tonights events but also events that happened within last few month and are recorded.

Grok AI:
The combination of (1) hackers gaining unauthorized access to your cellular security cameras, (2) using them to watch you in real time, (3) making death threats and sound harassment through the cameras, (4) deliberately causing harm to animals you care for, and (5) forcing you to incur hundreds or thousands of dollars in extra cellular data charges is textbook federal criminal conduct.
Federal law violations
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) – Unauthorized access with intent to defraud / cause damage | 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(5) | Hacking into your Reolink (or any other brand) cellular cameras without permission; obtaining live video/audio; causing you financial loss exceeding $5,000 | Up to 5–10 years (20+ if aggravated or repeated) |
| Wire Fraud | 18 U.S.C. § 1343 | Scheme using interstate wires (internet/cellular networks) to defraud you of money by forcing massive overages on your data plans | Up to 20–30 years |
| Aggravated Harassment / Cyberstalking | 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2) | Using the hacked cameras to cause you substantial emotional distress with death threats and real-time stalking | Up to 5–10 years (life if bodily injury occurs) |
| Interstate Transmission of Threats | 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) | Making death threats through the two-way audio of the cameras | Up to 5 years (7 if it involves extortion) |
| Stored Communications Act violation | 18 U.S.C. § 2701 | Intentionally accessing your cloud-connected cameras without authorization | Up to 5 years |
| Animal Cruelty (if they physically harm the cats using information from the cameras) | 18 U.S.C. § 48 or state laws elevated to federal if interstate | Deliberately using hacked camera feeds to locate and injure/kill community cats |
The user's situation involves potential violations of multiple Arizona state and federal laws: harassment, property damage, cybercrime, and animal cruelty. Given the victim's age, specific elder abuse statutes may also apply.
Applicable Laws and Criminal Charges
The actions described could lead to various criminal and civil charges:
Harassment and Stalking
Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 13-2921 (Harassment): This statute makes it a crime to knowingly and repeatedly commit acts that harass another person, including contacting them electronically or surveilling them in a manner that causes harassment.
A.R.S. § 13-2916 (Unlawful use of electronic communication device): This law prohibits using electronic communication to knowingly terrify, intimidate, threaten, or harass a specific person.
Federal Stalking Law (18 U.S. Code § 2261A): This federal law can be used if the harassment involves electronic communication (like hacked cameras) and places the victim in reasonable fear of serious injury or causes substantial emotional distress.
Property Damage and Assault
Assault (A.R.S. § 13-1203): Intentionally placing another person in fear of physical injury is considered assault under Arizona law. The projectile shooting at the home likely falls under this or related criminal damage statutes.
Criminal Damage: Destroying or damaging property (the home, cameras, etc.) without permission is a crime.
Cybercrime
Unauthorized Access/Hacking (Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and State Laws): Gaining unauthorized access to the cellular cameras and network is a serious offense under both state and federal law.
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA): Unauthorized interception or access to private electronic communications is a federal crime.
Financial Harm: The unauthorized use of cellular data and resulting charges could fall under financial exploitation laws.