Understanding the Differences Between BufferedInputStream and FileInputStream with Configured Size

Discover the key differences between BufferedInputStream and FileInputStream in Java. Learn how each affects performance and why BufferedInputStream is often the better choice.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63353521/ asked by the user 'Programming and Maths' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13154912/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63353749/ provided by the user 'Joachim Sauer' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/40342/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: "BufferedInputStream" vs "FileInputStream with configured size"

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Differences Between BufferedInputStream and FileInputStream with Configured Size

When working with file input streams in Java, you might find yourself asking: What’s the difference between using a BufferedInputStream and simply reading from a FileInputStream configured with a specific buffer size? This question arises particularly in contexts where performance is vital, and understanding the nuances can help you make informed decisions in your development process.

The Scenario

Let's consider two cases to clarify this:

Case 1: You create a BufferedInputStream wrapping an underlying FileInputStream. This BufferedInputStream might fetch a default buffer size of 1024 bytes from the file in a single system call, allowing for efficient reads.

Case 2: You directly use FileInputStream and configure it to read blocks of 1024 bytes. Essentially, you’re making individual read calls on the stream.

At first glance, it appears that both approaches yield the same result: reading chunks of data in 1024 byte sizes. So, what’s the added value of using BufferedInputStream over directly working with a FileInputStream?

Analyzing the Differences

Key Advantages of BufferedInputStream

Efficient Reading:

A BufferedInputStream reads a larger block of data (up to its buffer limit) in one system call. Fewer calls to the operating system can significantly enhance performance, especially when dealing with larger files.

Handling Partial Reads:

When you call read(byte[]) directly on FileInputStream, it might not fill your byte array completely in one go. In contrast, BufferedInputStream manages this situation gracefully, ensuring that your buffer is fully utilized.

Improved Code Readability and Maintenance:

By using BufferedInputStream, you adhere to the InputStream interface without worrying about the intricacies of buffering. This leads to cleaner code and enhances maintainability.

Compatibility:

Any API that takes an InputStream can seamlessly work with BufferedInputStream, allowing for versatile function usage across different methods and classes.

Why Not Just Use FileInputStream with a Set Buffer?

While it is possible to achieve manual buffering through FileInputStream, the added complexity often outweighs the benefits. Here’s why:

Manual Buffer Management: Handling your buffer manually can lead to complicated code, especially when data structures need to track multiple arrays.

Potential for Bugs: Managing partial reads and other edge cases increases the risk of errors and bugs in your application.

Conclusion

In summary, while you can replicate BufferedInputStream behavior using FileInputStream configured with buffer sizes, BufferedInputStream offers a straightforward solution that optimizes performance, simplifies coding, and minimizes error surfaces.

So, the next time you find yourself questioning whether to use BufferedInputStream, remember, it provides significant advantages that enhance overall software efficiency and readability without the accompanying headaches of manual management.

Keep coding smart and simplify your life!