$85 Silver in Shanghai Exposes COMEX Breakdown Paper vs Physical

Silver just crossed $85 per ounce in Shanghai — while COMEX still trades near $79.

That $6 price gap is not volatility.
It’s not speculation.
And it’s not temporary.

It’s a structural failure in the global silver market.

In this video, we break down why arbitrage has failed, why physical silver is now setting the price in Asia, and why the Western paper silver system is rapidly losing control. This is the clearest evidence yet that silver no longer trades in a single unified market.

Shanghai reflects real delivery demand — from solar manufacturers, EV producers, electronics firms, and industrial buyers who need metal now. COMEX reflects leverage, cash settlement, and trust. And tonight, that trust cracked.

We explain:

Why a $6 East–West silver gap should be impossible — and why it isn’t closing

How thin inventories and failed arbitrage expose paper silver stress

Why COMEX pricing depends on confidence, not availability

How inelastic industrial demand (solar, EVs, AI, defense) is overwhelming supply

Why the gold–silver ratio is historically unsustainable

What happens when paper markets lose authority to physical settlement

Why repricing never happens gradually — it happens violently

This is not a technical setup.
It’s not a chart pattern.
It’s a regime change.

When physical buyers stop believing paper promises, they don’t argue — they walk away. And when that happens, price discovery moves where the metal is.

Shanghai is no longer following COMEX.
COMEX is trying to survive Shanghai.

This video is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not financial advice.

📌 Watch closely. Share widely.
Because when paper markets finally break, they don’t ask for permission.

#Silver
#SilverSqueeze
#PreciousMetals
#PhysicalSilver
#Comex