Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
dTub
Скачать

How to Justify a LSAT Argument Using Logical Reasoning Drill Set 4

Автор: MyGuru Tutoring

Загружено: 2024-11-25

Просмотров: 523

Описание:

Learn how to engage a practice LSAT Logical Reasoning justify an argument question task at lawhub.lsac.org by highlighting the conclusion of the argument and then predicting a broad justification for the argument's conclusion before cross checking that prediction, rather than the full argument, against the answer choices.

Please like this video if you find the information in it helpful as you continue your #lsatprep journey, subscribe to this channel to receive notifications about new explanation videos as they become available, or become a member at
   / @myguruedge   for early and exclusive access to additional LSAT PrepTest and LawHub Drill Set practice problem explanations.

To learn more about the LSAT or the law school application process, visit the MyGuru LSAT & Law School Admissions blog at www.myguruedge.com/our-thinking/lsat-and-the-law-school-admissions-process or visit https://www.myguruedge.com/book_intro... to book a free LSAT instruction consultation. To learn more about the instructor, visit https://www.myguruedge.com/team/stefa...

LSAC LawHub LSAT Logical Reasoning Drill Set 4, Question 5:

Mathematician: Mathematics is often taught as if the object were simply to transmit a body of detailed information from teacher to student. But I hold that it is more important for teachers to impart an appreciation of the beauty and excitement of mathematics, since this approach has the following effect: when students develop such an appreciation, they will be more motivated to learn the details on their own, which will lead them to take further mathematics courses and ultimately learn much more mathematics than they would if they lacked this appreciation.

5. Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the mathematician's reasoning?

A) The paramount goal in teaching mathematics should be to maximize the amount of mathematics students will ultimately learn. (Correct)
B) It is no more important for students in a mathematics course to learn a body of detailed information than for them to become motivated to take further mathematics courses.
C) One goal in teaching mathematics should be to teach an appreciation of the beauty and excitement of mathematics.
D) Learning to detailed information about mathematics assists students in developing an appreciation of the beauty and excitement of mathematics.
E) The more mathematics courses students take, the more those students increase their appreciation of the beauty and excitement of mathematics.

How to Justify a LSAT Argument Using Logical Reasoning Drill Set 4

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео mp4

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио mp3

Похожие видео

How to Justify a LSAT Argument Using Logical Reasoning Drill Set 4

How to Justify a LSAT Argument Using Logical Reasoning Drill Set 4

How to Justify a LSAT Argument with a Principle Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 5

How to Justify a LSAT Argument with a Principle Using LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 5

LSAT Logical Reasoning: Three Ways to Find the Conclusion of an Argument

LSAT Logical Reasoning: Three Ways to Find the Conclusion of an Argument

Communicative Language Teaching : CLT Explained

Communicative Language Teaching : CLT Explained

LSAT Logical Reasoning LSAC LawHub - Drill Set 4 Explanations

LSAT Logical Reasoning LSAC LawHub - Drill Set 4 Explanations

Hack Your ACT Reading Score (EASY)

Hack Your ACT Reading Score (EASY)

Точный метод, позволяющий получить верные ответы на все вопросы LSAT (от человека с оценкой 180 б...

Точный метод, позволяющий получить верные ответы на все вопросы LSAT (от человека с оценкой 180 б...

LSAT Lab

LSAT Lab

Как я учусь в 45+? 🤓Ответ: по науке

Как я учусь в 45+? 🤓Ответ: по науке

Как усилить аргументацию по логическому мышлению в экзамене LSAT с помощью набора упражнений по л...

Как усилить аргументацию по логическому мышлению в экзамене LSAT с помощью набора упражнений по л...

Ep. 12: Sufficient Assumption/Justify the Conclusion Questions

Ep. 12: Sufficient Assumption/Justify the Conclusion Questions

Необходимое и достаточное предположение | Логическое рассуждение LSAT

Необходимое и достаточное предположение | Логическое рассуждение LSAT

Principle | LSAT Logical Reasoning

Principle | LSAT Logical Reasoning

Лижут ли Вас Собаки? ВОТ ЧТО ЭТО ЗНАЧИТ (вас шокирует)!

Лижут ли Вас Собаки? ВОТ ЧТО ЭТО ЗНАЧИТ (вас шокирует)!

Я Обманул Экспертов Элитной Парфюмерии Спреем с Пердежом

Я Обманул Экспертов Элитной Парфюмерии Спреем с Пердежом

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Finding the Main Point

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Finding the Main Point

Два моих фаворита в мире подкастов на английском

Два моих фаворита в мире подкастов на английском

Unia Europejska upadnie? Co dalej z Europą?

Unia Europejska upadnie? Co dalej z Europą?

Resolving a LSAT Logical Reasoning Paradox or Discrepancy with LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 1

Resolving a LSAT Logical Reasoning Paradox or Discrepancy with LawHub Logical Reasoning Drill Set 1

LSAT Cracked: Sufficient Assumptions | Matt Walsh | Harvard Law School

LSAT Cracked: Sufficient Assumptions | Matt Walsh | Harvard Law School

© 2025 dtub. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: infodtube@gmail.com