The Early Dating Of Revelation - Stephen Hackett

Explore one of the most debated topics in biblical scholarship: when was the Book of Revelation written? In this episode, Greek instructor Stephen Hackett presents a compelling case for an early date in the mid-60s AD, during the reign of Nero, rather than the more common placement in the 90s under Domitian.

Through historical evidence, textual analysis, and a close reading of Revelation’s internal clues, we examine why the early church often favored a pre-70 date, how Revelation portrays the Jerusalem temple as still standing, and why the turbulent world of the 60s aligns far better with the book’s urgency, symbolism, and apocalyptic tone.

This discussion brings clarity to the prophetic context of Revelation, the debate surrounding persecution under Nero versus Domitian, and what John’s perspective reveals about the crisis facing first-century believers. Whether you’re a student of Scripture, a history enthusiast, or someone exploring eschatology, this episode offers a measured, evidence-driven look at a vital question.

#BookOfRevelation #Eschatology #Nero #BiblicalHistory #EarlyDate #TempleInRevelation #NewTestamentStudies

00:00 — Introduction
08:03 — Was Revelation Written in the 60s?
08:26 — Why the Early Date Once Dominated Scholarship
09:23 — Revelation Portrays the Temple as Standing
10:14 — The Turbulence of Nero vs. the Calm of Domitian
11:02 — The Domitian Persecution Question
12:00 — Nero’s Actions and First-Century Upheaval
13:10 — Counting the Roman Emperors in Revelation
20:17 — John’s Silence on the Temple’s Destruction
22:16 — Revelation 11 and Luke 21 Compared
23:34 — John’s Version of the Olivet Discourse
25:07 — The Jewish War and the Three-and-a-Half-Year Timeline
25:44 — Prophecy as Pattern and Fulfillment
29:33 — Why 666 (and 616) Point to Nero

Facebook:   / seatforjesus  
Instagram:   / aseatforjesus  
X: https://x.com/ASeatForJesus
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/ASeatForJesus...