Anand Ranganathan EXPOSES Nehru, Congress, Emergency, Judiciary, Collegium & Hindu Discrimination

#AnandRanganathan #SanatanDharma #Hindutva #Democracy #Nehru #Emergency1975 #Judiciary
#Appeasement #HinduDiscrimination #WaqfAct
#CollegiumSystem #MSP #DelhiPollution #HinduRashtra #FreeSpeech

00:00 - intro
00:17 - Is Another Partition Coming?
04:50 - Democracy vs Dictatorship?
09:20 - Emergency Era: How Corruption Took Root
14:10 - Nehru's Legacy: Crushing Free Speech
20:40 - Mughal Names on Delhi Roads: Appeasement
26:15 - From Welfare to Warfare: Minority Appeasement
32:50 - Judiciary: Midnight Hearings & Selective Justice
39:30 - Double Standards in Genocide Cases
45:10 - Why Courts Bend to One Side
51:40 - Hindu Civilization's Strength
58:20 - Waqf Act & Temple state Control
1:05:10 - MSP: How Rice Is Poisoning Delhi's Air
1:12:40 - Incremental Change Is Our Only Hope
1:20:15 - Collegium System Exposed
1:28:50 - Power Abuse: Real Stories from the Courts
1:37:20 - National Values vs National Interest
1:44:10 - Can Sanatan Dharma Really Be Eradicated?

Anand Ranganathan argues that India faces a serious demographic threat, with large-scale illegal immigration potentially leading to another de-facto partition if unchecked. He strongly defends democracy against nostalgia for the Emergency era, asserting that trains running on time during Emergency came at the enormous cost of institutionalized high-level corruption, suspension of rule of law, press censorship, and judicial manipulation—damage that still affects India today.He sharply criticizes Jawaharlal Nehru, listing numerous instances of book/film bans, arrests of critics, and severe curbs on free speech implemented under his premiership, challenging the image of Nehru as a liberal icon. Ranganathan highlights the continued naming of major Delhi roads after Mughal rulers (especially Aurangzeb) as a symbol of long-standing historical appeasement of sections that committed atrocities against Hindus.He describes a dangerous progression: initial minority appeasement through welfare schemes has evolved into active discrimination against Hindus and even tacit support for elements hostile to them. He points to unequal laws (especially the Wakf Act), state control over Hindu temples but not mosques/churches, and selective judicial activism as glaring examples of systemic bias.Ranganathan criticizes double standards in the judiciary—midnight hearings for certain cases, reluctance to reopen old genocide cases against Kashmiri Pandits while pursuing older Sikh riot cases, and the apparent fear judges show toward one community compared to their treatment of Hindu critics (citing Nupur Sharma and Kanhaiya Lal cases).He stresses that Hindus must never adopt the violent, fear-based tactics of those they oppose, as that would destroy the very essence of Hindu civilization. Instead, he demands either removal of discriminatory laws or their uniform application to all religions.On environmental policy, he blames the MSP-driven paddy cultivation in Punjab-Haryana for severe groundwater depletion and the annual stubble-burning crisis that poisons Delhi’s air, calling it a classic case of politically expedient but environmentally disastrous populism.He expresses deep pessimism about quick solutions, describing the higher judiciary (especially the collegium system) as the most undemocratic and unaccountable institution in India. He shares personal experiences of facing contempt proceedings and observes pervasive judicial overreach combined with selective enforcement.Ultimately, he maintains that India’s core national values are rooted in Sanatan Dharma (questioning, debate, acceptance of the refugee, protection of the weak), and the real national interest lies in removing institutional discrimination against Hindus while preserving civilizational restraint and incremental democratic reform—though he sees the path as extremely difficult given current power structures and demographic trends.