Punishment verses Corrective Training

AskTop Sponsored by Mentormilitary.comhttps://www.mentormilitary.com/

Use PROMO Code YT10 to receive 10% at checkout for a limited time.

Welcome to another episode of Ask Top with Command Sergeant Major Retired MarK Gerecht and Richard Green, aka Oz. In this video, they discuss the difference between punishment and corrective training in the military. They explore the definition of punishment, which typically involves disciplinary actions carried out by commanding officers. They also touch on letters of admonishment as a form of punishment. The purpose of punishment is to maintain good order and discipline within the organization. The hosts delve into the concept of good order and discipline and its impact on the culture of an organization. They discuss the importance of meeting the minimum standards and the role of motivation and inspiration in exceeding those standards. The implementation of punishment is primarily the responsibility of commanders, as they have disciplinary authority. The hosts also highlight the importance of understanding the regulations surrounding punishment to ensure legality. They briefly touch on real-world examples of punishment and the rare instances of unusual disciplinary actions. The conversation then shifts to corrective training, which is often referred to by different names. Corrective training is seen as a way to address issues and improve performance without resorting to punishment. The hosts emphasize the role of leaders in providing effective corrective training and the importance of clear communication and guidance. Overall, this video provides valuable insights into the military's approach to maintaining discipline and improving performance through punishment and corrective training. Don't miss out on this informative discussion. Watch the video now!.