Dispatch identifies Min Hee Jin as central figure in NewJeans' downfall

Dispatch identifies Min Hee Jin as central figure in NewJeans' downfall .
If you feel great, please support the author by subscribing to our channel to track the next video.
You Should Watch It

. Top things you need to know: https://goo.gl/LJjmmT
. Latest news about Dumi Masilela: https://goo.gl/hk47HE
. Latest news about Zodwa Wabantu: https://goo.gl/Xaujk5
You Should Watch It
Subscribe Channel(Official) : http://goo.gl/UQo7mQ
Twitter Official:   / dailynewstht  
Plus Official: https://goo.gl/m9kou6
Webiste: https://goo.gl/NVWbtx
Subscribe Channel(Official) : http://goo.gl/UQo7mQ .

-------------------------------------
#latestnewszimbabwe #zimbabwenews #BreakingnewsZimbabwe
-------------------------------------
Subscribe Channel(Official) : http://goo.gl/UQo7mQ
 The latest buzz and the central focus of discussion in the Korean entertainment industry is the latest court ruling on the lawsuit between ADOR and NewJeans over the group's exclusive contract.   Court rules against NewJeans, ADOR contract still valid    On October 30 KST, the 41st Civil Division of the Seoul Central District Court delivered its initial ruling in the lawsuit questioning the validity of the exclusive contract between ADOR and girl group NewJeans. On this day, the court confirmed the validity of its exclusive contracts with the five members of NewJeans and stated, “The exclusive contracts signed between ADOR and NewJeans in 2022 are valid. The litigation costs will be borne by NewJeans.”   Dispatch's Analysis    Following the initial ruling, dozens of media outlets flooded the web with detailed results, dismissals, and statements from the court. On October 31, Dispatch released its own analysis of the lawsuit and identified Min Hee Jin as the key figure in NewJeans' downfall.  → NewJeans’ claims stem from Min Hee Jin’s premeditated actions.→ Min Hee Jin is not the key person of the exclusive contract.→ Min Hee Jin’s actions were not meant to protect NewJeans.→ Min Hee Jin intended to take NewJeans and go independent.→ Min Hee Jin reconstructed Hanni’s “ignore her” situation.    According to Dispatch, Min Hee Jin's name was repeatedly mentioned in the litigation; in fact, her name was brought up 104 times in the court documents. Dispatch explained, "The issue of breach of contract — Min Hee Jin. The start of the public dispute — Min Hee Jin. The misunderstanding surrounding 'ignore her' — Min Hee Jin. Her name was mentioned a total of 104 times in the ruling."  The plan, the attempt, and the failure of NewJeans’ “escape” — the key figure throughout the year-long battle was Min Hee Jin. On October 30, the Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 41 (Chief Judge Jung Hoe Il) ruled in favor of ADOR. In effect, it was a complete defeat for NewJeans.NewJeans demanded to terminate their contract, citing the following reasons among many:   - Management shortcomings caused by Min Hee Jin's dismissal - Damage to NewJeans' originality due to ILLIT copying NewJeans - Lack of response to the tra