Thunderbird Comeback or Design FLOP? Focus Group Slams 1998 Design Choices (Part 1)

0:00 – Exterior Proportions and Design Details
3:27 – Retro vs. Modern Design Philosophy
8:05 – Front End Criticism and Competitor Comparison

In 1998, a Thunderbird focus group was assembled to gauge consumer reaction to the proposed design and market position of the iconic nameplate's return. It's been a standard practice for automotive companies to use multiple focus groups during the design and development phase of a new model, and this particular session offers valuable insight into the challenges of updating a beloved classic.
Group participants immediately delve into a detailed critique of the car's exterior design. While the overall proportions are generally acceptable, the design details provoke strong reactions, particularly concerning the rear bumper, which is described as too plain and lacking distinctive Thunderbird heritage. The conversation then moves into a philosophical debate over whether the car should be a strict retro re-creation of the 1955 model or a bold, modern update aimed at younger baby boomers. The group emphasizes that the car needs to stand out and possess distinctive features.
This desire for distinctiveness is severely challenged by criticisms directed at the front end, which several participants felt was generic and, critically, too similar to the existing Ford Taurus sedan, robbing the design of its premium identity. Furthermore, the car is unfavorably compared to competitors like the BMW Z3, with participants highlighting concerns that the Thunderbird's design lacked the necessary energy, excitement, and overall curb appeal to successfully compete in the premium two-seater segment.

For availability and licensing inquiries, please contact:
https://www.globalimageworks.com/contact
Ref: S195