Understanding AES CTR Decryption: Aligning Results from Cryptodome and Cryptography

This guide explores the differences in AES CTR decryption results between the PyCryptodome and Cryptography libraries in Python, providing solutions to align their outputs and best practices for decryption.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69144760/ asked by the user 'Michal Charemza' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1319998/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69145557/ provided by the user 'Topaco' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9014097/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: AES CTR decryption: Cryptography and Cryptodome give different results

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding AES CTR Decryption: Aligning Results from Cryptodome and Cryptography

Cryptography is vital in securing sensitive information, and understanding how to decrypt data accurately is just as critical as encryption. A common challenge arises when working with different cryptographic libraries in Python, specifically when comparing results from the PyCryptodome and Cryptography libraries during AES CTR decryption. This guide delves into the issue, explaining why these libraries produce different results and how to correct the discrepancies.

The Problem

You might find yourself in a situation where you’re decrypting data using two different libraries, and the outputs don’t match. For example, using the following code snippets for AES decryption results in different outputs:

Code Snippet: Using PyCryptodome

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Code Snippet: Using Cryptography

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this discrepancy in output, one naturally wonders, “Why the difference?” and “How can I adjust my Cryptography implementation to match that of PyCryptodome?”

Why Do Different Results Occur?

The root of the issue lies in the default configurations of the counter used in both libraries. Here's a breakdown of the key differences:

Endianess:

PyCryptodome: By default, it starts counting at 1 in a little-endian format. This means it counts as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Cryptography: This library uses big-endian by default, and while you can set an explicit start value, it will continue counting in a different manner:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Initial Value:

Even when you explicitly set the counter in Cryptography to start at a specific value, it does not emulate how PyCryptodome’s counter increments, leading to different outputs after the first block.

Here’s how to visualize this with some sample code to compare:

Verification Code

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output

When you execute both pieces of code, you'll find that while the first block may match (due to similar counter values), the subsequent block outputs will not align due to different counting methodologies.

Solution: How to Ensure Consistency

To achieve consistent results across both libraries, consider these important steps:

Explicitly Set the Counter: When using the Cryptography library, ensure to set the counter to a value that begins with a value that aligns with how PyCryptodome counts.

Understand Endianess: Be aware of the endianess in your algorithms and ensure consistent usage across your implementations.

Currently, without significant changes to the libraries themselves, it's challenging to align the outputs perfectly if one is configured for little-endian and the other to big-endian settings.

Conclusion

When working with AES decryption in Python, understanding how different libraries implement their algorithms can save a lot of confusion. By aligning your counter settings and recognizing the implications of endianess, you can achieve consistent results in cryptographic operations.

Whether you're dealing with sensitive data or just exploring the fascinating world of cryptography, knowing the inner workings of these libraries will enhance your programming skills and data security practices.

Now, you're better equipped to tackle any discrepancies that arise from using different Python cryptography libraries. Happy coding!