The NTSB’s NEW Evidence in Greg Biffle’s Plane Crash Investigation

The NTSB has released its first briefing on the Greg Biffle jet crash — and while there are no conclusions yet, several key details are now confirmed.
In this video, we break down what investigators revealed, why the recovery of the cockpit voice recorder is such a critical development, and how it helps move the analysis beyond ADS-B data alone. We also look at why there was no mayday call, what that absence tells us about cockpit workload, and how a compressed timeline can quickly erase safety margins during an abnormal return to the airport.
The briefing also confirms physical evidence showing the aircraft was already too low on final approach, striking approach lighting before reaching the runway. Combined with weather conditions, airport geometry, and workload factors, this helps clarify how the final moments unfolded — even if it doesn’t yet explain why the return began.
As always, this analysis stays anchored to confirmed information and established human-factors principles, not speculation. The cockpit voice recorder will be the next major piece in this investigation, and it may ultimately answer the questions data alone cannot.

Key topics covered:
What the NTSB confirmed in its first briefing
Why the CVR recovery matters
ADS-B limitations vs cockpit insight
The absence of a mayday call
Single-pilot vs two-pilot workload considerations
Confirmed low approach and undershoot evidence
Weather, visual cues, and loss of margin

If you have observations or questions, leave them in the comments — we’ll discuss them together.
I’ll continue following this case as the investigation develops.
Fly safe.
#planecrashtoday #gregbiffleplanecrash #backboxanalyst