Anatomy of a Flawed TOR
Автор: Tanat Tonguthaisri
Загружено: 2025-09-18
Просмотров: 1
The provided document offers a *strategic justification for late revisions* to a Terms of Reference (TOR), explaining why issues could not be detected earlier. It highlights that *technical standards evolved and market feedback was crucial* in revealing an incompatibility regarding GPU specifications. Furthermore, *progressive discovery through stakeholder engagement* was necessary to uncover contradictions in personnel requirements, while *specialized legal expertise* was needed to clarify social security contributions. The text emphasizes that these **late-stage interventions are a form of active risk mitigation and quality assurance**, preventing potentially catastrophic financial losses and legal challenges. Ultimately, the document argues that these revisions align with **industry best practices for complex procurements**, ensuring feasibility and fair competition rather than signifying an oversight failure.
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке:
