" Presidential Reference LIVE PART - 2 "Constitution Bench" / Supreme Court of India/- DAY- 8
Автор: "Arvind P.Datar" Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India
Загружено: 2025-09-10
Просмотров: 3958
Senior Advocate Arvind P Datar (for the State of Punjab), while maintaining similar arguments on discretion, added that how long 'as soon as possible' would really depend upon the context of the Bill. He said that for a simple amendment, the Governor may not take much time, but for the complex Bills involving repugnancy, the Governor might take his time in consulting, for instance, the Advocate General of the concerned State. But that does not make the Governor a "constitutional filter" to withhold a Bill if he finds it repugnant with a central legislation or any subject matter in List III. Datar argued that the Union's argument that the Governor can withhold simpliciter will lead to a "constitutional paradox". He added that when the Bill is repugnant, the Article 254 route has to be followed. If the State legislature advises the Governor to reserve the Bill for the President's assent, which is repugnant to the centre's powers, Article 254(2) says that the Bill will become law to that extent for that particular State. But if the States do not follow the Article 254(2) route, it runs the risk of Article 254(1) and become void to that extent repugnant to the central law, he argued.
#courtproceedings #supremecourtjudges #taxlaw #supremecourtofindia #nani #palkhivala #courtproceedings #courtroomdrama #indianjudiciary #collegiumsystem #supremecourt #attorney #barister #Laws in india, #argument #laentrevistaconraulvalladares #lawyer #lawyerlife #law #lawenforcement#supremecourtlive #court #federalcourt #legaldiscussion #ias #education #indiancourt #courtlive #courtroomdrama #livesupremecourt #indiancourtslive#constitutionbench #president #governerpunjab
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке: