Australian Right Wing Stands Up Against Net Zero, Charlie Kirk & Cancel Culture | Mia Schlicht CPAC

In this video, I break down a fiery speech from the Institute of Public Affairs that takes direct aim at Australia’s net zero policies. The speaker claims that renewable energy projects, transmission lines, and government land access laws are not a “transition” but a “demolition” of regional communities. From cancel culture accusations to bold claims about farmland being lost, fire risks, and the “human cost” of net zero, I walk through the arguments and separate rhetoric from reality.

We’ll dive into the key points raised: the suggestion that 70% of Victoria’s farmland could be consumed by renewables, CFA volunteers saying they can’t fight fires around transmission towers, and accusations of intimidation against farmers. I’ll highlight where these arguments are powerful emotionally but shaky on evidence, and where mainstream modelling from AEMO, CSIRO, and Treasury shows a different picture about costs, energy security, and the real pathway to net zero.

This is about more than one speech—it’s about how the climate debate in Australia is being framed as feelings vs facts, city vs country, and left vs right. If you want to understand how arguments against net zero are being built and how to counter them with credible evidence, this is the video for you. Join me as we unpack the talking points and explore what’s really at stake for households, farmers, and Australia’s future.

👀 Find me here:

Youtube:    / @troytalkslive  
TikTok:   / troytalkslive  
Twitch:   / troytalkslive  
X: https://x.com/troytalkslive
Kick: https://kick.com/troytalkslive

🚀 Help support this channel:

https://streamelements.com/troytalksl...