What if Tony Soprano Didn't Send Feech La Manna Back to Prison?

What if Tony hadn't had Feech sent back to prison when he did? In this video, I analyze the consequences that may have unfolded for Tony Soprano and the DiMeo crime family if Tony had not arranged for Feech La Manna to violate parole and return to prison.

A few key points:
Feech's Immediate Behavior: Feech's disruptive actions immediately after his release, which included beating up the guy who'd been working on the lawns in the neighborhood for 26 years and being involved in a mass carjacking at a wedding.

Threat to Authority and Business: Feech's blatant disrespect for the established pecking order posed a direct threat to Tony's authority. Furthermore, his reckless and unapproved criminal activities could have created unnecessary "popcorn headlines," putting the entire family at risk of greater law enforcement scrutiny.

The Tony B Situation: Could Feech's continued presence have influenced Tony Blundetto? He could have potentially prevented Tony B from taking the desperate and ultimately disastrous Joey Peeps job.

Later Conflicts: The video also considers if Feech's "tough attitude" could have been a benefit in Season 6 by providing "our own Phil on the New Jersey side" to push back against the aggression of Phil Leotardo.

Conclusion: I ultimately conclude in the video that setting Feech up was the least crappy option among crappy options. I argue that Feech was not rehabilitated, and without intervention, his behavior would have escalated, likely leading to more bloodshed or serious trouble that would have harmed the organization.

I'd love to hear what you think!

Join this channel to get access to perks:
   / @sopranosblueprint  

#thesopranos #sopranos #tonysoprano #feechlamanna

Blog: https://sopranosblueprint.com
Twitter:   / srosendorf1014  
Instagram:   / srosendorfdiaz  
Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/sopranosteph

Copyright disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, sharing copyrighted materials for “fair use” purposes, such as criticism, commentary, teaching, and research, is permissible and not considered a violation of copyright law.