How to Limit the Number of Threads in List type .AsParallel in F#

Discover how to effectively limit concurrent threads when using the `AsParallel` method in F# . Learn with practical examples for optimizing API calls.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66149374/ asked by the user 'Martin Thompson' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4537346/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66153941/ provided by the user 'Tomas Petricek' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/33518/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to Limit the number of Threads in list type .asParallel in F#

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Limiting Threads in F# with AsParallel

In modern programming, leveraging parallel processing can significantly improve the performance of applications, especially when dealing with I/O-bound operations like API calls. However, managing concurrency effectively is vital to avoid overwhelming resources or hitting rate limits. In this guide, we'll explore how to limit the number of threads when using the AsParallel method in F# .

The Problem

Suppose you have a list of 1,500 items, and each item requires an API call to retrieve information. You want to maximize the efficiency of your calls without exceeding a limit of 6 concurrent threads to ensure your application runs smoothly. You might be wondering, “Is my approach to limit the threads correct?”

Here is the initial code snippet that you might consider:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, this code has some quirks that might not yield the parallel behavior you're expecting.

Understanding the Issue

The first issue with the initial approach is that AsParallel works differently than one might think. The method Seq.map performs a synchronous iteration over a collection, and consequently, your tasks end up running sequentially. This means you’re not achieving the desired parallelism.

Testing the Current Scenario

To see how your parallelization code functions, you might test it with the following:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This example allows you to see how each order is processed, but without proper parallel execution, you're not utilizing the available threads.

The Solution

To correctly implement parallelism, you’ll need to replace Seq.map with a method suited for handling parallel queries, such as Select. This change allows each order to be processed concurrently, respecting the thread limit you specified.

Revised Code Implementation

Here’s the revised code that accomplishes the required behavior:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Elements of the Solution

Using Select: The Select method on ParallelQuery is designed for parallel execution and allows your tasks to run concurrently.

Controlling Concurrency: The WithDegreeOfParallelism(6) method ensures that you only run 6 threads at a time over your list.

Force Evaluation: Adding |> Seq.length at the end triggers the evaluation of the lazy sequence, allowing you to see the results.

Conclusion

By replacing Seq.map with Select, you can efficiently limit the number of concurrent threads when processing lists in F# . This approach is particularly useful when making multiple API calls, ensuring both performance and stability.

If you run into similar issues or have further questions on multithreading in F# , feel free to ask in the comments below!