Debunking William Lane Craig's new retcon of the Carroll/Craig Debate

In this video, I respond to William Lane Craig’s recent review of his 2014 debate with cosmologist Sean Carroll. Craig presents his review as if it strengthens his case—but in reality, it contains misleading statements that need to be addressed.
One of the most troubling aspects of Craig’s review is that he hides information from his audience. ICraig openly admitted to a mistake in his retrospective review, but glosses over its importance that we highlight here.
Craig also continues to be deeply confused about the Borde–Guth–Vilenkin (BGV) theorem. While he insists it supports his cosmological arguments, both Alan Guth and Alex Vilenkin—the authors of the theorem—have gone on record clarifying what it really means.



If you want the real story behind the Craig vs Sean Carroll debate and Craig’s misleading review, this video breaks it all down with evidence, sources, and direct quotes.
🔔 Subscribe for more critical responses, debates, and fact-checks on philosophy, science, and theology.

My video with Alex Vilenkin is here:
   • Before the Big Bang 9: A Multiverse from "...  

and Ala Guth is here:
   • Before the Big Bang 4 : Eternal Inflation ...  

You can get Battle of the Big Bang here:
https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Big-Ban...
00:00 Introduction
1:01 Craig admits his error
1:51 Carrol Chen model
3:04 Wall theorem
4;58 Roger Penrose and Jose Senovilla
5:47 Singularity
6:31 Another mistake?
7:47 BGV theorem
9:17 Alan Guth
10:38 Alex Vilenkin
12:13 Craigs inside tip
12:53 Guth explains why he rejects the beginning
14:55 Craig' deception revealed
15:53 reversing times arrow
17:06 Christian Cosmologist corrects Craig
18:43 another misquote exposed
19:52 Anthony Aguirre