Master Fluid Assessment Strategies Mini Course Chapter 2 Pulse Pressure Variation

Mini-Course: Master Fluid Assessment Strategie
Chapter 2 Pulse Pressure Variation
Full course only accessible on Patreon:   / whiteboardmedicine  

🫀 Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV): A Bedside Guide

📖 What PPV Is (and the Physiology Behind It)

• Definition: PPV is the respiratory cycle–induced variation in arterial pulse pressure (systolic – diastolic) in mechanically ventilated patients.
• Physiology: Positive-pressure inspiration ↓ venous return → ↓ RV filling → after a few beats ↓ LV preload → ↓ SV & PP. Expiration does the opposite.

• Key concept: Bigger swings in PP = ventricle operating on the steep part of the Frank–Starling curve → likely fluid responsive.

📏 How to Measure PPV

✅ Conditions for Accuracy
• Controlled mechanical ventilation (no spontaneous effort).
• Regular rhythm (sinus preferred).
• Vt ≥ 8 mL/kg PBW (or use a tidal volume challenge if lung-protective).
• Closed chest, stable vasopressors/vent settings, good arterial line tracing.

🧮 Step-by-Step Calculation
1. From a good arterial line waveform, note:
o PPmax = highest pulse pressure (SBP–DBP).
o PPmin = lowest pulse pressure.

2. Apply formula:



3. Average across 2–3 cycles for stability.

4. Many modern monitors calculate PPV automatically (double-check prerequisites!).

💡 Tidal Volume Challenge
• Temporarily ↑ Vt from 6 → 8 mL/kg PBW (if safe) for ~1 min.
• Reassess PPV or SV changes to improve accuracy in low-Vt ventilation.

🩺 How to Use PPV

📊 Thresholds
• PPV ≥ 13% → fluid responsive likely.
• PPV ≤ 9% → fluid responsive unlikely.
• PPV 9–13% → gray zone → confirm with adjuncts.

⚡ Clinical Actions
• High PPV → consider small fluid bolus with CO/SV tracking.
• Low PPV → fluids unlikely to help; optimize pressors/inotropes/vent.
• Gray zone → add PLR, mini-fluid challenge, or tidal volume challenge.

💪 Strengths

• Better predictor than static indices (CVP, PAOP).
• Continuous & real-time when arterial line in place.
• Simple to use; integrates into goal-directed therapy.
• Helps reduce unnecessary fluid overload.

⚠️ Pitfalls & When PPV Is Less Accurate

❌ Less Reliable When:
• Spontaneous breathing effort present.
• Arrhythmias (AF, frequent ectopy).
• Low Vt ventilation without challenge.
• Low driving pressure or poor compliance.
• RV failure, pulmonary HTN, ↑ intra-abdominal pressure.
• Open chest, one-lung ventilation, prone positioning.
• Artifact-ridden/damped arterial waveform.

🟨 Gray Zone (9–13%)
• Don’t interpret as yes/no → it is one of many data points

📚 Evidence Snapshot

• Meta-analyses: PPV/SVV outperform static indices for predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

• ICU studies: Accuracy hinges on controlled settings (adequate Vt, sinus rhythm, no spontaneous breathing).

• Guidelines: Surviving Sepsis endorses dynamic variables (PPV, SVV, PLR) over static ones.

• Low Vt solutions: Tidal volume challenge restores accuracy.

• Adjuncts: PLR with CO tracking is robust even when PPV is invalid.

🔀 Quick Bedside Algorithm

1. ✅ Confirm prerequisites (vent, rhythm, Vt, Aline).

2. 📏 Measure PPV.
o ≥13% → likely fluid responsive → test bolus with CO/SV monitoring.
o ≤9% → unlikely → avoid blind fluids.
o 9–13% → gray zone → consider additional volume assessment approaches

3. 🔄 Reassess hemodynamics & perfusion after any intervention.