Resolving the Error (10448): VHDL Record Type Not Declared Issue in Your Implementation

Learn how to fix the VHDL error about undeclared record types in your code, ensuring correct implementation of combinational logic with clock barriers.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68040969/ asked by the user 'Drigs' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16263643/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68041266/ provided by the user 'Tricky' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8567231/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Error (10448): VHDL error at teste.vhd(33): record type std_ulogic is used but not declared

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the Error (10448): VHDL Record Type Not Declared Issue in Your Implementation

If you’ve been delving into VHDL and have come across the puzzling error: Error (10448): VHDL error at teste.vhd(33): record type std_ulogic is used but not declared, you are not alone. This common issue tends to frustrate many developers, especially those working on projects involving multiple clock barriers, input, and output logics. In this post, we will not only help you understand the problem but also guide you step by step to resolve it.

Understanding the Problem

The error message points out that you’ve referenced a record type (std_ulogic) without properly declaring it. This typically happens when the sensitivity list in a process statement includes an erroneous syntax. The challenge often arises during the implementation of combinational logic in conjunction with clock signals.

Key Components of Your Code

Clock and Clear Signals: Fundamental for managing state transitions.

Input Vectors: a and b represent the binary inputs.

Output Vector: s is the result, which combines inputs using logic operations.

Processes: For handling functionality on clock events and clear signals.

Solution Steps

Here’s how to effectively resolve the issue.

Step 1: Correcting the Sensitivity List

The root of the problem lies in the way the sensitivity list was constructed. You should use a comma (,) instead of a dot (.) in your process sensitivity list.

Original Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Revised Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Understanding the Process

Here's a breakdown of the corrected section:

process(clock, clear): This states that the process will operate every time there’s a change in either clock or clear.

This adjustment ensures proper functionality and aligns with VHDL syntax requirements.

Step 3: Complete Corrected Code Example

Let’s consolidate these changes into the corrected code structure. Here’s how the VHDL entity should look after the update:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Correcting the sensitivity list from a dot (.) to a comma (,) in your VHDL code prevents the record type std_ulogic is used but not declared error from occurring. This simple edit will help you effectively implement your desired logic using two clock barriers for input and output.

By following these steps, you can get back to focusing on the exciting parts of your VHDL projects without the annoyance of lingering errors. Happy coding!