Science Can Neither Prove God Nor Disprove Him — And That Is Its Greatest Discovery

In this thought-provoking discussion, we explore the limits of science, the failure of both atheism and blind religious polemics, and why the real debate has shifted from scientific proof to existential meaning.

Modern science has acknowledged its own limitations. It cannot answer:

Why does existence exist?

Why are we born without choice?

Why is death inevitable?

What does human helplessness really mean?

Atheism stops at the universe. Religion stops at God.
But does stopping anywhere truly solve the problem of infinite regress?

This video challenges:

Cosmological arguments

Contingency vs necessity

Non-personal “First Cause” concepts

God as a mere philosophical explanation

The misuse of science by both atheists and emotional religious preachers

Instead, we move toward an existential framework:
👉 Human helplessness
👉 Meaning, mortality, suffering
👉 Relationship with God, not just proof
👉 Why Qur’anic discourse addresses existence, not abstract logic

This is not a debate.
This is a shift in methodology.

If you’re a student, thinker, skeptic, believer, or someone caught between science, atheism, and faith, this video will challenge how you think — and why you think at all.



#DoesGodExist
#ScienceAndGod
#LimitsOfScience
#ExistentialPhilosophy
#AtheismDebate
#IslamicPhilosophy
#MeaningOfLife
#HumanExistence
#CosmologicalArgument
#ContingencyArgument
#FaithVsScience
#ModernAtheism
#PhilosophyOfReligion
#WhyDoWeExist