YouTube BANS AI, Netflix Doubles Down on AI. Will it replace actors? EP. 1

Welcome to the first episode of Need To Film Podcast - where technology fanatic Mik and traditional "legacy filmmaker" Dimi collide over the future of storytelling. In this explosive first episode, we tackle the monumental shifts happening in filmmaking and content creation, from Netflix’s AI usage in VFX to YouTube’s controversial demonetization of "low-effort" AI content, and ask the ultimate question: Can a machine truly create art?

💡 The Core Debate: Human Art vs. Economic Reality
We kick off the discussion by dissecting the biggest news of the week: an independent Argentinian sci-fi film on Netflix using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to achieve complex visual effects (VFX)—specifically, a massive building collapse—at a 90% cost reduction and incredible speed. Mik champions this as a win for filmmakers, enabling ambitious visions constrained by shoestring budgets and traditional methods. He argues that the film industry is driven by economics and that AI is simply the next evolution, much like how hand-drawn animation was replaced by computers, referencing the evolution of Disney and Pixar. Dimi, while reluctantly agreeing that this specific use of environmental VFX serves the story and empowers the artist's vision, draws a hard line at the human performance.

🎥 The Soul of Performance: Actors and Authenticity
The conversation heats up as we delve into the perceived 'soul' of a performance. Dimi maintains that while AI can replicate technical expressions (like a quivering lip), it cannot replicate the emotional commitment and authentic human experience that connects an audience to a character. Mik, drawing on his experience as a trained actor and industry insider, challenges the notion of "authenticity" in highly-produced, staged film sets. He argues that filmmaking is inherently a "Wizard of Oz" illusion, where actors and editors (the unsung heroes of any acting Oscar, as Dimi learns) assemble a believable world and performance through technical skill, which he believes AI will eventually master. We examine motion capture in films like Avatar to see where the human element truly lies.

YouTube, AI Slop, and Attention Spans
We pivot to the wild west of online video, analyzing YouTube's new policies on AI and "low-effort" content. We agree that the platform has been flooded by "AI slop"—faceless, regurgitated compilations using synthesized voices that plague user algorithms and contribute to what we call "brain rot" content. Mik, an advocate for the proper use of AI, applauds YouTube's move to prioritize real human creativity and voices, asserting that if there is no profit incentive (no monetization), the low-quality content will disappear. We debate the value of a 'faceless channel' versus a channel built on authenticity and personality, with Mik using his own channel as an example of why the host's identity matters.

'Kira': The Proof of Concept for AI Filmmaking?
Finally, Mik puts his money where his mouth is, discussing the controversial 15-minute short film "Kira", a fully AI-generated movie made by one person, telling the compelling story of a cloned 1950s singer. Mik believes "Kira" has crossed the chasm into viable storytelling, arguing that the technology's imperfections are cleverly masked by a grainy, pseudo-historical aesthetic. Dimi, however, remains unconvinced, confessing he skipped through the film, finding it uncompelling and lacking the emotional 'soul' necessary to connect. We conclude with a fun (and financially risky) high-stakes bet on whether an AI film will ever make Dimi cry.

Don't miss this crucial debate on the intersection of cinema, creativity, economics, and AI technology! Subscribe now for the latest insights, hot takes, and arguments on the future of media.

AI in Film, Visual Effects (VFX), Netflix, YouTube Monetization, Low-Effort Content, Kira Short Film, AI Actors, Storytelling, Economics of Filmmaking, Human Performance, Motion Capture, Generative AI, Technology.