Популярное

Музыка Кино и Анимация Автомобили Животные Спорт Путешествия Игры Юмор

Интересные видео

2025 Сериалы Трейлеры Новости Как сделать Видеоуроки Diy своими руками

Топ запросов

смотреть а4 schoolboy runaway турецкий сериал смотреть мультфильмы эдисон
dTub
Скачать

K.S. Manjunath v. Moorasavirappa| Specific Performance | Bona Fide Purchaser |₹5 Crore Equity Relief

Автор: legal world

Загружено: 2025-11-19

Просмотров: 138

Описание:

In this video, we break down the Supreme Court of India's important judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. 13507–13508 of 2025, where the Court upheld the High Court’s decree of specific performance for a 2000 Agreement to Sell (ATS) but imposed a unique balancing-equity condition requiring the original vendees to pay ₹5 Crores to the subsequent purchasers.

This case is crucial for understanding:
✅ When a suit for specific performance is maintainable
✅ What makes a contract “determinable” under the Specific Relief Act
✅ Legal standards for a bona fide purchaser without notice
✅ How the Supreme Court balances equities in long-pending property disputes

🧾 Key Highlights of the Judgment

1️⃣ Maintainability of Suit
The Supreme Court held that a separate prayer challenging termination is not mandatory when the termination itself is unilateral, arbitrary, and not contractually permissible.

2️⃣ Determinable Contract (Section 14 Specific Relief Act)
A contract is “determinable” only if it can be terminated at the sweet will of a party. Since the ATS here could be terminated only for specific reasons, it was not determinable.

3️⃣ Bona Fide Purchaser Test (Section 19(b))
The subsequent purchasers were not bona fide, as they had actual notice of the ATS and failed to make basic due-diligence inquiries—amounting to “wilful abstention”.

4️⃣ Balancing Equity
Although specific performance was granted, the Court directed payment of ₹5,00,00,000/- + interest + balance consideration to compensate for 18 years of elapsed time.

📚 Chapters (Timestamps)

00:00 – Introduction
01:05 – Case Background & Timeline
04:40 – Issues Before Supreme Court
05:20 – Maintainability of Suit
07:15 – Determinable Contract Explained
09:30 – Bona Fide Purchaser Analysis
12:10 – Readiness & Willingness of Vendees
13:45 – Supreme Court’s Final Directions
15:20 – Practical Impact of This Judgment
17:00 – Conclusion

#specificperformence performance #india #supremecourt court #judgment #analysis #bonafidepurchaserlaw #indianlaw #propertylaw #2025 #determinablecontractsection14 #supremecourtcaseexplanation #landdisputes #judgment #agreementtosellcaselaw #legalanalysis #hindi #supremecourtlatestjudgment

#️⃣ Hashtags

#SupremeCourt #LegalAnalysis #SpecificPerformance #PropertyLaw #IndianLaw #CaseLaw #JudgmentExplained #LawStudents #Advocates

K.S. Manjunath v. Moorasavirappa| Specific Performance | Bona Fide Purchaser |₹5 Crore Equity Relief

Поделиться в:

Доступные форматы для скачивания:

Скачать видео mp4

  • Информация по загрузке:

Скачать аудио mp3

Похожие видео

New Supreme Court judgement regarding of Senior citizen||Section 23 senior citizen act 2007||

New Supreme Court judgement regarding of Senior citizen||Section 23 senior citizen act 2007||

अब

अब "Ex-Partee Decree" में भी मिलेगा प्रतिवादी को विशेष अधिकार! Supreme Court Landmark Judgement

Anticipatory Bail Is Permissible Under SC/ST Act Only If Prima Facie Offence Isn't Made Out: SC

Anticipatory Bail Is Permissible Under SC/ST Act Only If Prima Facie Offence Isn't Made Out: SC

Это подземное озеро в Антарктиде меняет всё, что мы знаем о жизни на Земле

Это подземное озеро в Антарктиде меняет всё, что мы знаем о жизни на Земле

क्या आपकी वसीयत Court में Reject हो जाएगी | SC का बड़ा फैसला | Legal Will Explained in Hindi l will

क्या आपकी वसीयत Court में Reject हो जाएगी | SC का बड़ा फैसला | Legal Will Explained in Hindi l will

ИНТЕРВЬЮ МУХТАРА АБЛЯЗОВА УКРАИНСКОМУ КАНАЛУ POLITEKA ONLINE

ИНТЕРВЬЮ МУХТАРА АБЛЯЗОВА УКРАИНСКОМУ КАНАЛУ POLITEKA ONLINE": ПУТИН НАПУГАН ДЕЙСТВИЯМИ УКРАИНЫ

138NI ACT CASES /SUMMARY TRIAL#newcase #lawyer #lawpreparation

138NI ACT CASES /SUMMARY TRIAL#newcase #lawyer #lawpreparation

Supreme Court Guidelines on Maintenance |Rajnesh v. Neha| Mandatory Affidavit, Set-Off & Enforcement

Supreme Court Guidelines on Maintenance |Rajnesh v. Neha| Mandatory Affidavit, Set-Off & Enforcement

Могут ли ВСЕ говорить НА ОДНОМ ЯЗЫКЕ? — ТОПЛЕС

Могут ли ВСЕ говорить НА ОДНОМ ЯЗЫКЕ? — ТОПЛЕС

138NI ACT| #legal #legalregisterdoccument

138NI ACT| #legal #legalregisterdoccument

Как американцы случайно подарили русским сверхзвуковой дрон за 400 миллионов | Lockheed D-21

Как американцы случайно подарили русским сверхзвуковой дрон за 400 миллионов | Lockheed D-21

Property Transfer through GPA,Agreement to Sell, and Will Not Valid Without Registered Sale Deed: SC

Property Transfer through GPA,Agreement to Sell, and Will Not Valid Without Registered Sale Deed: SC

S. 482 CrPC/S.528BNSS Supreme Court Lays Down Four-Step Test For High Courts To Quash Criminal Cases

S. 482 CrPC/S.528BNSS Supreme Court Lays Down Four-Step Test For High Courts To Quash Criminal Cases

Offences Of 'Cheating' & 'Criminal Breach Of Trust'Cannot Co-Exist On Same Allegations:Supreme Court

Offences Of 'Cheating' & 'Criminal Breach Of Trust'Cannot Co-Exist On Same Allegations:Supreme Court

Kerala High Court Quashes POCSO Case | “Vagaries of Adolescence” Judgment Explained

Kerala High Court Quashes POCSO Case | “Vagaries of Adolescence” Judgment Explained

Kesavananda Bharati Case 1973 Explained | Birth of the Basic Structure Doctrine | Landmark  Judgment

Kesavananda Bharati Case 1973 Explained | Birth of the Basic Structure Doctrine | Landmark Judgment

Arnesh Kumar Guidelines:- a judgment that forever changed how police handle arrests in India. 🚔⚖️

Arnesh Kumar Guidelines:- a judgment that forever changed how police handle arrests in India. 🚔⚖️

Supreme Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Case | Clean Hands Doctrine | Rekha Ushir vs. Saptashrungi 2025

Supreme Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Case | Clean Hands Doctrine | Rekha Ushir vs. Saptashrungi 2025

Supreme Court on Murder vs Attempt to Murder | Maniklal Sahu Case (2025 INSC 1107)

Supreme Court on Murder vs Attempt to Murder | Maniklal Sahu Case (2025 INSC 1107)

Order 18 Rule 17 A cpc :साक्ष्य को पुनः खोलने पर निर्णय : k k velusamy vs n palanisamy sc Judgement

Order 18 Rule 17 A cpc :साक्ष्य को पुनः खोलने पर निर्णय : k k velusamy vs n palanisamy sc Judgement

© 2025 dtub. Все права защищены.



  • Контакты
  • О нас
  • Политика конфиденциальности



Контакты для правообладателей: [email protected]