Calling yourself salafi ? & salafi sect is wrong ❌

0:00 Sh. ibn uthimeen warning against salafi sect
0:57 The warning
2:37 Sh Othman’s commentary on Sh. Ibn uthimeen statement on the sect of Salafies
3:27 further elaboration on what sheik ibn uthimeen was saying
3:40 Sh. Ibn uthimeen emphases on how this was not in the companions
5:31 Sh Othman the default in everyone is that they are salafi
6:59 Sh. Fawzan on calling oneself salafi when needed
7:29 Sh Fawzan the conditions when it’s not permissible to say that you a salafi
8:11 Practical implementation of calling yourself a salafi when

If Tyler becomes a Muslim what sect is he when he reverts ?

A. Ashari
B. Salafi
C. No sect

If you’re choosing no sect then you’ve made salafi into a hizb, just like the sofuies and Shia asharis,. & you are also then therefore saying : “it’s not the default natural state of a Muslim” as in people are born deviants not upon the Sunnah, since no one other the ones who follow the salafs method are upon the Sunnah of the propeht ﷺ we are the only saved group we will going to jannah as said by the Hadith. Salafi methodology is the only ahul al sunnah only saved sect only correct path all rest are deviated.



Anyone’s who does not follow the method of the salaf ( predecessors) is deviated, the people who make salafi a sect ask them if someone who never heard of the word salafi and never said that they were salafi, and were Brazilian or Chinese or non Arabs, who take from the companions and the 4 imams and the tabeen, do you think these people are also from the saved sect ? Or no because they never said they were salafi ? If yes they are and the default truly is salafi then everyone is salafi, and everyone is upon the correct path until proven otherwise, it’s Infact the deviant ahsaris who say that you have to reach a level of knowledge and understanding to become an ashari you can not just be default settings like that, and that’s the way of all sects, they have a norm they have a certain way they call others deviant by default until proven otherwise, why can this word salafi only be used like that when shiek saleh al fawzan said that salafi is Ahul Al Hadith, when someone who speaks English would say upon the predecessors, is the name salaf important because of the meaning that it entails of the default method of a Muslim, or is it because it represents a specific closed group ? Did we choose to be in this group or did we choose to stay in it ?


The people who follow the sect of salafism and not the actual method of the salaf, they will stay silent on what ibn uthimeen RH said about salafi sect, and will be loud & attacking and refuting any other “salafi method”scholar who says the same thing as ibn uthimeneen , because they tie the haq with people, & not Quran and Sunnah, and you’ll see this as evident in the comments.

They will quote other scholars with out context and follow cherry pick translations and sayings to justify making a hizb and group, where when the book of Allah had forbid that & all those scholars did as well, we are the default group, and they’ll find their ways to justify it. The salafi sect goes beyond just saying that Allah is above the throne in the heavens in the highness ulu, and being against innovations( which are good things), they will un- justly label people as deviants until no one is left, and attribute certain scholars to a sect when they don’t claim to be apart of the sect and just followers of the default salafi methodology like the 95% of Muslims


We will continue to stand strong against all sects, and this cult following method, and we be clear we love our scholars and take from them and depend on them, Imam Albani bin baz ibn uthimeen saleh al fawzan, Saleh al usami, Abdul razaq bader , Abdul Salam al shuwair, sheik jami, sheik muqbil, waleed saeedan, Saleh luhidan, Abdul Aziz al sheik, sheik al sheik, imam Ahmed Ibn hambal & Ibn taymiah and sheik Mohmmed ibn Abdul wahab, Aziz Farhan, sheik Suhami, Othman Al Khamees Suliman Al ruhali, Ibn jibreen, and we are upon their Aqeedah and upon their manhaj upon their creed doctrine school of thought method.

& you’ll find those who will condem some of these scholars and label them as deviant for any specific reason reason, and will excuse other scholars that have done the same specific thing, having a bias tieing the haq with people & making their pick of scholars into their sect