Abrams vs Leopard vs T90 Tanks Comparison

The M1 Abrams, Leopard 2, and T-90 are three of the most prominent main battle tanks (MBTs) in modern military arsenals. Each has unique features and capabilities that reflect their design philosophies and operational requirements. Below is a detailed comparison based on various aspects such as armament, armor, mobility, and overall performance.
Origins and Development
M1 Abrams: Developed in the United States during the 1970s, the Abrams has undergone numerous upgrades to enhance its combat effectiveness. It is known for its robust armor and advanced technology.
Leopard 2: Designed by Germany, the Leopard 2 has been in service since the late 1970s and is recognized for its mobility and reliability. It has also seen various upgrades over the years.
T-90: The T-90 was developed in Russia as a successor to the T-72, entering service in the 1990s. It is noted for being cost-effective while still providing significant firepower.
Specifications Comparison
Feature M1 Abrams Leopard 2 T-90
Main Armament 120mm M256 smoothbore gun 120mm smoothbore gun 125mm 2A46M smoothbore gun
Engine Power 1,500 HP gas turbine engine 1,500 HP diesel engine 1,250 HP diesel engine
Top Speed 72 km/h (45 mph) 70 km/h (43 mph) 60 km/h (37 mph)
Operational Range 426 km (265 miles) 550 km (340 miles) 550 km (340 miles)
Crew Size 4 4 3
Weight 61.3 tonnes 62.5 tonnes 46.5 tonnes
Armor Type Composite with depleted uranium Modular composite armor Composite with Kontakt-5 ERA
Performance Analysis
Armor and Protection
The M1 Abrams features advanced composite armor that includes layers of depleted uranium, providing exceptional protection against both kinetic and chemical projectiles. It is considered one of the most protected tanks globally.
The Leopard 2 uses modular armor that allows for quick repairs in the field. Its design effectively protects against various threats while maintaining mobility.
The T-90, equipped with Kontakt-5 explosive reactive armor (ERA), offers good protection against HEAT rounds but is less effective against kinetic penetrators compared to the Abrams' armor.
Firepower
The M1 Abrams is armed with a highly accurate 120mm smoothbore gun capable of firing rounds like the M829A4 APFSDS, which excels in penetration power.
The Leopard 2 shares a similar armament with the Abrams but benefits from a more advanced fire control system that enhances targeting capabilities.
The T-90's main gun can fire a wider variety of munitions, including guided missiles like the 9M119 Refleks, allowing it to engage targets at greater distances.
Mobility
The M1 Abrams is faster than both competitors, with a top speed of approximately 72 km/h. Its gas turbine engine provides acceleration and performance on varied terrains.
The Leopard 2, while slightly slower than the Abrams, maintains high mobility due to its powerful diesel engine and lighter weight compared to the Abrams.
The T-90, being lighter than both Western tanks, can maneuver effectively in softer terrains but has a lower top speed.
Cost and Maintenance
The T-90 is cheaper to procure and maintain compared to the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2, making it an attractive option for many countries looking to expand their armored forces economically.
The M1 Abrams has higher operational costs due to its complex systems and maintenance requirements.

Disclaimer:
The content presented in this video is for informational and educational purposes only. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information, errors and omissions may occur. The information provided in this video are presented as source and does not reflect the views of RC Daily Updates. This content is not intended to represent official positions, policies, or views of any organization, government, or entity. The representations of countries in this video are intended for informational purposes only and may not accurately reflect the current political boundaries or territorial claims. We strive for accuracy but recognize that geopolitical situations can change. Please consult official sources for the most up-to-date information." All information, graphics, and representations in this video are based on publicly available sources and do not infringe on the rights of any third party. This video does not aim to promote any unauthorized claims or political statements. Some of the pics and footages are used for visualization purpose only and doesn't related to content. Viewers are encouraged to conduct their own research and verify the information. I am not responsible for any actions taken based on this content. Copyright Notice: Most of the pictures, and clips included in the video belongs to the respected owners and we do not claim rights. Some of the footage used in this video may have been sourced from various media outlets and are used under the principles of fair use for criticism, commentary, and educational purposes. No copyright infringement is intended. Thank you for your support and understanding.