Amy Coney Barrett EXPOSES Flawed Logic in Girls' Sports Debate
Автор: Hearing Unsealed
Загружено: 2026-01-14
Просмотров: 0
During oral argument, Justice Amy Coney Barrett posed a pointed hypothetical to test the government’s theory on sex-separated sports teams. She asked why a cisgender boy who cannot make the boys’ team — and who demonstrably lacks any competitive advantage — would still be barred from playing on a girls’ team.
Counsel responded that sex-separated teams are not based on athletic skill, but on sex-based physical differences that typically emerge through puberty. The justification, according to the argument, is to preserve equal athletic opportunities for female athletes by controlling for those differences — not to create tiers based on ability.
The exchange highlights a central legal question: whether eligibility rules are grounded in biological sex, competitive advantage, or a combination of both — and who determines when that advantage no longer exists.
#HearingUnsealed
#SupremeCourt
#AmyConeyBarrett
#TitleIX
#GirlsSports
#OralArguments
#SportsLaw
#SCOTUS
Доступные форматы для скачивания:
Скачать видео mp4
-
Информация по загрузке:
