ATHEIST Say It’s ‘Just Logic’ — But Watch What Happens | Burdened

#atheist #burdenofproof #atheism

00:00 – Intro: Why I'm Responding Publicly
02:22 – Clarifying My Position on Burden of Proof
04:13 – The Atheist “Default” Position Problem
09:40 – The Double Standard in Definitions and Claims
13:02 – Who Gets to Define Words?
15:49 – When Mockery Replaces Argument
17:59 – Final Thoughts: I’ve Said My Piece

Some atheists say their position is “just logic”—no belief, no burden, no problem. But when you examine their arguments closely, something doesn't add up.

In this video, I respond to a multi-part rebuttal series by an atheist critic who reviewed my older content on atheism and burden of proof. Instead of responding directly, he declined further conversation—so I’m laying out the response here for everyone else to see.

👁️‍🗨️ Here’s what I address:

What actually counts as a claim—and why some atheists dodge the label.

The problem with redefining terms mid-argument.

Why it matters who gets to define key words like “atheism” or “belief.”

And how tone, mockery, and sarcasm can cloud honest discussion.

This isn’t just about one critic. These patterns show up across a lot of atheist arguments—and it's time we expose the logical inconsistency behind the “just logic” claim.

📺 Want more context? Watch these videos: • Why Atheists Have a Burden of Proof
• The Truth About Atheism and Belief
• Full Syllogism: Why Atheists Still Carry a Burden

👍 If you find this helpful, like, comment, and share—it helps a lot.

📌 Subscribe to follow more content on faith, logic, and scriptural analysis:
👉    / @jonathancowens  

Music:    • The End - LLow