S. Kaçmaz and the Critique of Marxism: “The Historical and Theoretical Blind Spots of Marxism”

Today on our table we don’t simply have an academic text; we could say we have something like a stick of dynamite placed at the foundations of an entire system of thought.


Yes, quite a bold opening.

Indeed. Drawing on Safa Kaçmaz’s Human Science and Marx, we will examine the critiques that shake the foundations of one of the most influential ideas of the 20th century—Marxist theory.

And our aim is to separate these sources for our listeners and reveal the most striking points, isn’t it?

So let’s begin with a question. Does that famous thesis we all know—the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles—really rest on as solid a ground as it is assumed?

#MarxismCritique #ClassStruggleMyth #MarxistTheory #HistoricalMaterialism #SafaKaçmaz #HumanScience #MarxCriticism #DialecticalMaterialism #MarxExposed #CapitalismVsSocialism #PhilosophyOfHistory #PoliticalTheory #MarxismDebunked #IdeologyCritique #20thCenturyThought #MarxistFlaws #ClassTheory #RevolutionaryTheory #AntiMarxism #SociologyDebate #PoliticalPhilosophy #HistoryOfIdeas #MarxismAnalysis #MaterialistHistory #CommunismCritique #LeftWingTheory

Marxism critique, class struggle myth, does class struggle explain history, Marxist theory flaws, Safa Kaçmaz Marx, historical materialism debunked, Marx wrong about history, criticism of Marxism, Marxist ideology exposed, class struggle thesis false, Marx class warfare, dialectical materialism problems, Marx 20th century critique, is Marxism scientific, Marxism foundations shaken, Marx class struggle quote wrong, anti-Marxist arguments, Marxist history thesis, communism theoretical flaws, Marx and class theory, political philosophy Marx critique, Marxism academic criticism, why Marxism failed theoretically, Marx dynamite critique, history not class struggle, Safa Kaçmaz Human Science, Marxist revolution theory, sociology vs Marxism