ATF CRUSHED In Court! (Frame Receiver Rule)

We have yet another injunction granted vs. the ATF, this time to stop the ghost gun "frame receiver" rule, linked and explained in the videos below. The ATF is trying to expand their jurisdiction by defining words that go beyond their legal authority, or so at least claim the plaintiffs. The federal court judge agreed and issued a ruling (also linked below) stating as such.

But what does this mean for firearm owners? What legal trends are we witnessing emerge that can have a broader impact beyond those in the privately manufactured firearm world, aka "ghost guns"?

Ex-prosecutor Tom Grieve breaks it down in this video.

Link to Case
https://storage.courtlistener.com/rec...

Link to US Supreme Court: Thompson-Center “When Parts Become Guns”
   • Constructive Possession + Intent: Parts ar...  

ATF "Ghost Gun" Letter/Ruling
   • ATF "Ghost Gun" Frame vs. Receiver Rule EX...  

Link to Vanderstok v. Garland Video
https://youtube.com/live/sgck2nUI-1Y

Legal Disclaimer: nothing in this video is offered as legal advice or a formation of attorney-client relationship. If you want to hire my firm to be a client, you need to do just that and hire us... not watch us on the internet. If that offends your delicate sensibilities, just stop and be an adult. If you are outside of Wisconsin and want an attorney, contact one near where you are and stop trying to blame the internet and other people for your problems.

Link to attorney Tom Grieve's brief bio
https://www.grievelaw.com/CriminalDef...

#2ndamendment #atf #ghostguns