"Minimal Interference" Makes No Sense??

Video explains how the rise in blocking is caused by the minimal interference rule, the unintended side effects, why the rule legalises blocking, causes of inconsistent decisions, as well as potential rule changes to start a discussion.
If you are kind and would like to support me financially: https://buymeacoffee.com/quashbadsquash
email: [email protected]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fair use guides:
"Fair use is a legal doctrine that says use of copyright-protected material under certain circumstances is allowed without permission from the copyright holder."

"Courts typically focus on whether the use of copyright-protected material is “transformative.” This means whether the use adds new expression or meaning to the original material, or whether it merely copies from the original." - Quash Bad Squash compiled footage from several matches to criticise current rules; the video forms a persuasive argument.

"Commercial uses are less likely to be considered fair use, but it’s still possible to monetize a video that contains fair use material." - The video is not monetized.

"Using material from primarily factual works is more likely to be fair use than using purely fictional works." - Sports footage is factual.

"Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. But, if what’s borrowed is considered the "heart" of the work, sometimes even a small sampling may weigh against fair use." - My videos do not include the highlights of the match or game/s. If you want to know how the match went, you must visit SquashTV. My content does not take away from the originals use, certainly not the "heart". Rather, my videos focus on the most neglected area, the sort that are CUT from highlight videos.