Supreme Court verdict on Article 370 | J&K | Article 370 Abrogation

Supreme Court verdict on Article 370 | J&K | Article 370 Abrogation #article370scrapped #article370

Friends, after 4 years, four months and 6 days, the government's decision was approved.
The President's order to abrogate Article 370 is constitutionally valid.
The Supreme Court upheld the reorganization of Ladakh as a Union Territory.
The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 is a temporary provision. The Supreme Court also said that the decision of the Central Government on Jammu and Kashmir will remain in place. The Supreme Court said that the power of the President continues even after the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly.
Article 370 was a provision of the Indian Constitution. It gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir. This limited the usefulness of the Indian Constitution in the state.
On 6 August 2019, the Government of India revoked the special status, or autonomy, granted to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.
While giving the verdict on Article 370, the Supreme Court said that under Article 356, there are restrictions on the powers that can be exercised after imposing President's rule.
According to the December 11 list uploaded on the Supreme Court website, a five-judge bench headed by the country's Chief Justice DY Chandrachud pronounced this decision. Apart from the CJI, this bench has Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjeev Khanna, BR Gavai and Surya Kant.
The Chief Justice said that when Raja Hari Singh signed the merger agreement with India, the sovereignty of Jammu and Kashmir had ended. It became under India. It is clear that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. The Constitution of India is superior to the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 is a temporary arrangement.

#Article370 #JammuKashmir #SupremeCourt